From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264533AbTLIJyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 04:54:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264354AbTLIJuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 04:50:13 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:47295 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264321AbTLIJuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 04:50:06 -0500 From: Andreas Jellinghaus Subject: Re: State of devfs in 2.6? Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:48:54 +0100 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity. (Debian GNU/Linux)) Message-Id: References: <200312081536.26022.andrew@walrond.org> <20031208154256.GV19856@holomorphy.com> <20031208233428.GA31370@kroah.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg, what about adding those patches to the hotplug utils directory, so people can find them easily and test sysfs+udev on empty /dev directories? Regards, Andreas