linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] s390/unwind: use current_frame_address() to unwind current task
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:05:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <patch.git-04dd26be3043.your-ad-here.call-01630504868-ext-6188@work.hours> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <your-ad-here.call-01630505035-ext-2999@work.hours>

current_stack_pointer() simply returns current value of %r15. If
current_stack_pointer() caller allocates stack (which is the case in
unwind code) %r15 points to a stack frame allocated for callees, meaning
current_stack_pointer() caller (e.g. stack_trace_save) will end up in
the stacktrace. This is not expected by stack_trace_save*() callers and
causes problems.

current_frame_address() on the other hand returns function stack frame
address, which matches %r15 upon function invocation. Using it in
get_stack_pointer() makes it more aligned with x86 implementation
(according to BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST output) and meets stack_trace_save*()
caller's expectations, notably KCSAN.

Also make sure unwind_start is always inlined.

Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
 arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h     |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 3d8a4b94c620..22c41d7fd95c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -34,16 +34,6 @@ static inline bool on_stack(struct stack_info *info,
 	return addr >= info->begin && addr + len <= info->end;
 }
 
-static __always_inline unsigned long get_stack_pointer(struct task_struct *task,
-						       struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	if (regs)
-		return (unsigned long) kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
-	if (task == current)
-		return current_stack_pointer();
-	return (unsigned long) task->thread.ksp;
-}
-
 /*
  * Stack layout of a C stack frame.
  */
@@ -74,6 +64,16 @@ struct stack_frame {
 	((unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0) -			\
 	 offsetof(struct stack_frame, back_chain))
 
+static __always_inline unsigned long get_stack_pointer(struct task_struct *task,
+						       struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (regs)
+		return (unsigned long) kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
+	if (task == current)
+		return current_frame_address();
+	return (unsigned long) task->thread.ksp;
+}
+
 /*
  * To keep this simple mark register 2-6 as being changed (volatile)
  * by the called function, even though register 6 is saved/nonvolatile.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
index de9006b0cfeb..5ebf534ef753 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static inline bool unwind_error(struct unwind_state *state)
 	return state->error;
 }
 
-static inline void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state,
-				struct task_struct *task,
-				struct pt_regs *regs,
-				unsigned long first_frame)
+static __always_inline void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state,
+					 struct task_struct *task,
+					 struct pt_regs *regs,
+					 unsigned long first_frame)
 {
 	task = task ?: current;
 	first_frame = first_frame ?: get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
-- 
2.25.4

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-01 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-30 13:11 [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 5.15 merge window Heiko Carstens
2021-08-30 20:17 ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-08-31  2:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-31  7:09   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-08-31 10:13     ` Heiko Carstens
2021-08-31 10:46       ` Marco Elver
2021-08-31 15:02         ` Marco Elver
2021-08-31 15:18           ` Heiko Carstens
2021-08-31 17:48           ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-31 17:49             ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-01 14:03           ` Vasily Gorbik
2021-09-01 14:05             ` Vasily Gorbik [this message]
2021-09-01 17:51               ` [PATCH] s390/unwind: use current_frame_address() to unwind current task Marco Elver
2021-09-01 18:07                 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-09-03 23:23               ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=patch.git-04dd26be3043.your-ad-here.call-01630504868-ext-6188@work.hours \
    --to=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).