From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<avri.altman@wdc.com>, <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
<pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <beanhuo@micron.com>,
<cang@codeaurora.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kuohong.wang@mediatek.com>,
<peter.wang@mediatek.com>, <chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>,
<andy.teng@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: use existed well-defined functions
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:58:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1eewh5jr0.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577192466-20762-1-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> (Stanley Chu's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2019 21:01:04 +0800")
Stanley,
> This patchset fixes two small place to use existed well-defined
> functions to replace legacy statements.
Applied to 5.6/scsi-queue, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-03 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-24 13:01 [PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: use existed well-defined functions Stanley Chu
2019-12-24 13:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: unify scsi_block_requests usage Stanley Chu
2019-12-24 15:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-12-25 4:07 ` Stanley Chu
2019-12-25 8:21 ` Can Guo
2019-12-26 17:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-12-24 13:01 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: use ufshcd_vops_dbg_register_dump for vendor specific dumps Stanley Chu
2019-12-24 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-12-25 8:18 ` Can Guo
2019-12-27 1:33 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: use existed well-defined functions Alim Akhtar
2020-01-03 2:58 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1eewh5jr0.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).