From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20200423205226.496-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20200423205226.496-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Reply-To: Mathieu Desnoyers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.efficios.com (mail.efficios.com [167.114.26.124]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BW6M41mzz1n4v for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Sender: "lttng-dev" To: Philippe Proulx Cc: Diamon discuss , lttng-dev , Jeremie Galarneau , Genevieve Bastien List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" >> , >> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> >> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25 >> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers >> --- >> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644 >> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata): >> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps >> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the >> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end >> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream. >> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the >> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the > > "greater than or equal to" done > >> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same >> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to >> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet > > "less than or equal to" done, Thanks! Mathieu > > Phil > >> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream >> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that >> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in >> -- > > 2.11.0 -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5479C83000 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.lttng.org (lists.lttng.org [167.114.26.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712E320575 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.lttng.org header.i=@lists.lttng.org header.b="q/lo8SnB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 712E320575 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lists.lttng.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Received: from lists-lttng01.efficios.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BW6P2w9Fz1mwr; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.lttng.org; s=default; t=1588100093; bh=Ol/Kb+t7T07CtCppRhgHJbpr1qQEsDwosj3KlE+6M4E=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=q/lo8SnBtmkLhJMDpXjZ5MSuUn74Mt5KmibW7gAp8QlNiEQOgyDOVxlF/vywR0MRt QcF/+GdVF+oaQQtylddW1c84vahfjkV5x7mC3Ur6qXnaB3uslaO2Ftq+Z+qEAzgk1w H8MhnkmuDss9sST4CphBDmscMZoRYfcLS7pk56hsoRl9TgI7xN62bJgbtNUybX6pSA qG94c5Hvuhk/XQFENP/gmVnX4XfB6MwQc347ACLBlQBbWeN09+8e/AY0x+UJX35Z9l Z/YVmB+ZTrrGv2zTN/rgM9GlY9Yf2ARdSICs7CxwhL6yU2/+f7eHuAivqqwhNkBnU/ 85FIVzRgIwvGw== Received: from mail.efficios.com (mail.efficios.com [167.114.26.124]) by lists.lttng.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BW6M41mzz1n4v for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DDE27F571; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id GmZ4f-10pnFP; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A82627F723; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com 9A82627F723 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id oP1Ptg9dnPNp; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail03.efficios.com (mail03.efficios.com [167.114.26.124]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9D127F81D; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT) To: Philippe Proulx Message-ID: <252145848.72946.1588100085527.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20200423205226.496-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20200423205226.496-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1480394831.72907.1588099321783.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [167.114.26.124] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3918 (ZimbraWebClient - FF75 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3895) Thread-Topic: Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Thread-Index: N6AKTdmIChPLgLNAHcYNiDvUTQN2wETvbhnO Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin X-BeenThere: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: LTTng development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev Reply-To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Diamon discuss , lttng-dev , Jeremie Galarneau , Genevieve Bastien Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org Sender: "lttng-dev" Message-ID: <20200428185445.kQa98SdG8tjzT5C511MXyTgbTQcBj8AGYEw6Kok1cAM@z> ----- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx pproulx@efficios.com wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" >> , >> diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> >> Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25 >> Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers >> --- >> common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644 >> --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md >> +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md >> @@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata): >> range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps >> assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the >> beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end >> - of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the >> - timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream. >> - See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> + timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the >> + beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the > > "greater than or equal to" done > >> + timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same >> + stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to >> + be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet > > "less than or equal to" done, Thanks! Mathieu > > Phil > >> + within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail. >> * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream >> free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that >> were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in >> -- > > 2.11.0 -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev