From: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com, geliangtang@gmail.com,
qitiepeng@chinatelecom.cn,
Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:18:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624004309-54480-1-git-send-email-liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
fix issue: ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR use pm.add_signal to mark event, so
in some case pm.add_signal will be flush when ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR in
process.
fix issue: if ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo process at the same time,
only one event can write pm.add_signal. so ADD_ADDR will process
after add_timer timeout or ADD_ADDR-echo will not be process.
Patch 1 fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe clear addr_signal each other.
Patch 2 and 3 deal ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo with separately to fix
conflicts in using pm.addr_signal porcess.
Patch 4 MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT is not necessary.
v1->v2:
- remove READ_ONCE under the pm spin lock.
v2->v3:
- Patch 2: rename mptcp_pm_should_add_addr to mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr
- Patch 3: avoid read-modify-write of msk->pm.addr_signal and change
mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal to return void.
v3->v4:
- Patch 1: use ~(BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL) | BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO)) instead
of BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL)
- Patch 3: simple the code; init flags; fix wrong goto logic code;
Yonglong Li (4):
mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate
mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT
include/net/mptcp.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/options.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/mptcp/pm.c | 53 +++++++---------
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 10 ++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 31 ++++------
5 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 8:18 Yonglong Li [this message]
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 11:20 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 3:51 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 6:42 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:15 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 7:39 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:49 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 8:06 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:42 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:51 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 8:29 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1624004309-54480-1-git-send-email-liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=qitiepeng@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).