From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
To: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:58:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+WQbwvCWgCog4jxVjpQxvJ0_ojms8ND=gP1WJUA=0B-zGB-=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624930899-99623-4-git-send-email-liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn> 于2021年6月29日周二 上午9:42写道:
>
> according MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO flag build
> ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option
>
> add a suboptions type OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ECHO to mark as echo option
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> include/net/mptcp.h | 3 ++-
> net/mptcp/options.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 33 +++++++++++---------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 23 ++++++++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index d61bbbf..d2c6ebe 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ struct mptcp_out_options {
> u64 sndr_key;
> u64 rcvr_key;
> u64 ahmac;
> - struct mptcp_addr_info addr;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info local;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info remote;
> struct mptcp_rm_list rm_list;
> u8 join_id;
> u8 backup;
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index 1aec016..1707bec 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -655,13 +655,15 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
> bool drop_other_suboptions = false;
> unsigned int opt_size = *size;
> - bool echo;
> - bool port;
> - int len;
> + u8 add_addr, flags = 0xff;
> + int len = 0;
>
> - if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_ipv6(msk) ||
> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk) ||
> - mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) &&
> + if (!mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, opts, &add_addr))
> + return false;
This add_addr argument is useless, let's drop it.
And here add back mptcp_pm_should_add_signal check here. The original code
called mptcp_pm_should_add_signal twice for double check, once out of pm
lock, once under pm lock. We should keep it.
> +
> + if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk) ||
> + (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr(msk) &&
> + (opts->local.family == AF_INET6 || opts->local.port))) &&
> skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
> pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
> opts->suboptions = 0;
> @@ -671,11 +673,17 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
> drop_other_suboptions = true;
> }
>
> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ||
> - !(mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, remaining, &opts->addr, &echo, &port)))
> - return false;
>
> - len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts->addr.family, echo, port);
> + if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) {
> + flags = (u8)~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
> + } else {
> + opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
> + msk->remote_key,
> + &opts->local);
Keep this ahmac generating code after opts->suboptions set just like the
original code, since ahmac is the more expensive to populate. If remaining
length isn't enough, no need to set ahmac.
> + flags = (u8)~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> + }
> +
> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts);
> if (remaining < len)
> return false;
>
> @@ -683,13 +691,14 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_add_addr(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
> if (drop_other_suboptions)
> *size -= opt_size;
> opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
> - if (!echo) {
> - opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
> - msk->remote_key,
> - &opts->addr);
> - }
> - pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=%d, port=%d",
> - opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, echo, ntohs(opts->addr.port));
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> + WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, flags & msk->pm.addr_signal);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
addr_signal has been set in mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal in patch 1, no need to
set it again. I thinks this trunk and all the flags set above should be
dropped.
> +
> + pr_debug("addr_signal:%x, echo=%d, local_addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, local_port=%d, remote_addr_id=%d, remote_port=%d",
> + add_addr, (opts->ahmac == 0), opts->local.id,
> + opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->local.port), opts->remote.id, ntohs(opts->remote.port));
>
> return true;
> }
The whole function is something like this:
'''
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
bool drop_other_suboptions = false;
unsigned int opt_size = *size;
int len;
if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk) ||
!mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(msk, remaining, opts))
return false;
if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk) ||
(mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr(msk) &&
(opts->local.family == AF_INET6 || opts->local.port))) &&
skb && skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb)) {
pr_debug("drop other suboptions");
opts->suboptions = 0;
opts->ext_copy.use_ack = 0;
opts->ext_copy.use_map = 0;
remaining += opt_size;
drop_other_suboptions = true;
}
len = mptcp_add_addr_len(opts);
if (remaining < len)
return false;
*size = len;
if (drop_other_suboptions)
*size -= opt_size;
opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr(msk)) {
opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
msk->remote_key,
&opts->local);
}
pr_debug("addr_signal:%x, echo=%d, local_addr_id=%d,
ahmac=%llu, local_port=%d, remote_addr_id=%d, remote_port=%d",
msk->pm.addr_signal, (opts->ahmac == 0), opts->local.id,
opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->local.port),
opts->remote.id, ntohs(opts->remote.port));
return true;
'''
> @@ -1229,15 +1238,19 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>
> mp_capable_done:
> if (OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR & opts->suboptions) {
> + struct mptcp_addr_info *addr = &opts->remote;
We can simplify it like this:
struct mptcp_addr_info *addr = opts->ahmac ? &opts->local :
&opts->remote;
> u8 len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
> u8 echo = MPTCP_ADDR_ECHO;
>
> + if (opts->ahmac)
> + addr = &opts->local;
And this trunk can be dropped.
> +
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
> - if (opts->addr.family == AF_INET6)
> + if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
> len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
> #endif
>
> - if (opts->addr.port)
> + if (addr->port)
> len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_LEN;
>
> if (opts->ahmac) {
> @@ -1246,25 +1259,25 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
> }
>
> *ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_ADD_ADDR,
> - len, echo, opts->addr.id);
> - if (opts->addr.family == AF_INET) {
> - memcpy((u8 *)ptr, (u8 *)&opts->addr.addr.s_addr, 4);
> + len, echo, addr->id);
> + if (addr->family == AF_INET) {
> + memcpy((u8 *)ptr, (u8 *)&addr->addr.s_addr, 4);
> ptr += 1;
> }
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
> - else if (opts->addr.family == AF_INET6) {
> - memcpy((u8 *)ptr, opts->addr.addr6.s6_addr, 16);
> + else if (addr->family == AF_INET6) {
> + memcpy((u8 *)ptr, addr->addr6.s6_addr, 16);
> ptr += 4;
> }
> #endif
>
> - if (!opts->addr.port) {
> + if (!addr->port) {
> if (opts->ahmac) {
> put_unaligned_be64(opts->ahmac, ptr);
> ptr += 2;
> }
> } else {
> - u16 port = ntohs(opts->addr.port);
> + u16 port = ntohs(addr->port);
>
> if (opts->ahmac) {
> u8 *bptr = (u8 *)ptr;
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> index cf873e9..9c621293 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> @@ -253,32 +253,25 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_prio_received(struct sock *sk, u8 bkup)
>
> /* path manager helpers */
>
> -bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> - struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port)
> +bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_out_options *opts,
> + u8 *add_addr)
Drop this add_addr argument.
> {
> - u8 add_addr;
> - int ret = false;
> -
> spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>
> - /* double check after the lock is acquired */
> - if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
> - goto out_unlock;
Keep this double check code.
> -
> - *echo = mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk);
> - *port = mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_port(msk);
> -
> - if (remaining < mptcp_add_addr_len(msk->pm.local.family, *echo, *port))
> - goto out_unlock;
Keep this length double check code too.
> + if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk)) {
> + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> + return false;
> + }
>
> - *saddr = msk->pm.local;
> - add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~(BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL) | BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO));
- WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
This code is just added in patch 1, I think we should keep it. And no need
to write addr_signal again in mptcp_established_options_add_addr.
> - ret = true;
> + opts->local = msk->pm.local;
> + opts->remote = msk->pm.remote;
> + *add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal;
>
> -out_unlock:
> spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> - return ret;
Keep this out_unlock code.
> +
> + if ((mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk)) && (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr(msk)))
> + mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
Could we use mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack here instead of open coding?
I'm no sure why we need this two lines, and why you use '&&' here. Do you
mean set MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO at the same time?
> + return true;
> }
The whole function is something like this:
'''
int ret = false;
u8 add_addr;
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
/* double check after the lock is acquired */
if (!mptcp_pm_should_add_signal(msk))
goto out_unlock;
if (remaining < mptcp_add_addr_len(opts))
goto out_unlock;
opts->local = msk->pm.local;
opts->remote = msk->pm.remote;
if (mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk))
add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO);
else
add_addr = msk->pm.addr_signal & ~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal, add_addr);
ret = true;
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
if (ret && mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_echo(msk) &&
mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr(msk))
mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
return ret;
'''
>
> bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index a0b0ec0..0bfbbdef 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -737,16 +737,23 @@ static inline bool mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.addr_signal) & BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned int mptcp_add_addr_len(int family, bool echo, bool port)
> +static inline unsigned int mptcp_add_addr_len(struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
> {
> - u8 len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
> + u8 len = 0;
> + struct mptcp_addr_info *addr = &opts->remote;
We can simplify it like this:
struct mptcp_addr_info *addr = opts->ahmac ? &opts->local :
&opts->remote;
And keep the orignal code unchanged.
>
> - if (family == AF_INET6)
> - len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
> - if (!echo)
> + if (opts->ahmac) {
> + addr = &opts->local;
> len += MPTCPOPT_THMAC_LEN;
> + }
> +
> + if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
> + len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
> + else
> + len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
> +
> /* account for 2 trailing 'nop' options */
> - if (port)
> + if (addr->port)
> len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_LEN + TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_ALIGN;
>
> return len;
The whole function is something like this:
'''
struct mptcp_addr_info *addr = opts->ahmac ? &opts->local :
&opts->remote;
u8 len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_BASE;
if (addr->family == AF_INET6)
len = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR6_BASE;
if (opts->ahmac)
len += MPTCPOPT_THMAC_LEN;
/* account for 2 trailing 'nop' options */
if (addr->port)
len += TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_LEN + TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PORT_ALIGN;
return len;
'''
Thanks.
-Geliang
> @@ -760,8 +767,8 @@ static inline int mptcp_rm_addr_len(const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list)
> return TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RM_ADDR_BASE + roundup(rm_list->nr - 1, 4) + 1;
> }
>
> -bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> - struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port);
> +bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_out_options *opts,
> + u8 *add_addr);
> bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list);
> int mptcp_pm_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 1:41 [PATCH v6 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 1:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 5:43 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-29 1:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 1:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 5:58 ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2021-06-29 6:05 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-29 7:01 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 7:35 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-29 7:54 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 8:25 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-30 1:30 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-30 2:05 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-30 6:50 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-29 1:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+WQbwvCWgCog4jxVjpQxvJ0_ojms8ND=gP1WJUA=0B-zGB-=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).