netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] net: enable SOCK_NOSPACE for UDP
Date: Fri,  5 Apr 2024 00:37:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da265997eb754925e30260eb4c5b15f3bff3b43.1712273351.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)

wake_up_poll() and variants can be expensive even if they don't actually
wake anything up as it involves disabling irqs, taking a spinlock and
walking through the poll list, which is fraught with cache bounces.
That might happen when someone waits for POLLOUT or even POLLIN as the
waitqueue is shared, even though we should be able to skip these
false positive calls when the tx queue is not full.

Add support for SOCK_NOSPACE for UDP sockets. The udp_poll() change is
straightforward and repeats after tcp_poll() and others. However, for
sock_wfree() it's done as an optional feature flagged by
SOCK_SUPPORT_NOSPACE, because the feature requires support from the
corresponding poll handler but there are many users of sock_wfree()
that might be not prepared.

Note, it optimises the sock_wfree() path but not sock_def_write_space().
That's fine because it leads to more false positive wake ups, which is
tolerable and not performance critical.

It wins +5% to throughput testing with a CPU bound tx only io_uring
based benchmark and showed 0.5-3% in more realistic workloads.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h |  1 +
 net/core/sock.c    |  5 +++++
 net/ipv4/udp.c     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 2253eefe2848..027a398471c4 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -944,6 +944,7 @@ enum sock_flags {
 	SOCK_XDP, /* XDP is attached */
 	SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW, /* Indicates 64 bit timestamps always */
 	SOCK_RCVMARK, /* Receive SO_MARK  ancillary data with packet */
+	SOCK_NOSPACE_SUPPORTED, /* socket supports the SOCK_NOSPACE flag */
 };
 
 #define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE))
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 5ed411231fc7..e4f486e9296a 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3393,6 +3393,11 @@ static void sock_def_write_space_wfree(struct sock *sk)
 
 		/* rely on refcount_sub from sock_wfree() */
 		smp_mb__after_atomic();
+
+		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_NOSPACE_SUPPORTED) &&
+		    !test_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags))
+			return;
+
 		if (wq && waitqueue_active(&wq->wait))
 			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLOUT |
 						EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 11460d751e73..309fa96e9020 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum,
 		hslot2->count++;
 		spin_unlock(&hslot2->lock);
 	}
+	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_NOSPACE_SUPPORTED);
 	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
 	error = 0;
 fail_unlock:
@@ -2885,8 +2886,20 @@ __poll_t udp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
 	/* psock ingress_msg queue should not contain any bad checksum frames */
 	if (sk_is_readable(sk))
 		mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
-	return mask;
 
+	if (!sock_writeable(sk)) {
+		set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
+
+		/* Order with the wspace read so either we observe it
+		 * writeable or udp_sock_wfree() would find SOCK_NOSPACE and
+		 * wake us up.
+		 */
+		smp_mb__after_atomic();
+
+		if (sock_writeable(sk))
+			mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND;
+	}
+	return mask;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_poll);
 
-- 
2.44.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 23:37 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2024-04-05  9:11 ` [PATCH net-next v2] net: enable SOCK_NOSPACE for UDP Eric Dumazet
2024-04-05 11:45   ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1da265997eb754925e30260eb4c5b15f3bff3b43.1712273351.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).