From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:53:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20100816095325.GA8547@ff.dom.local> References: <1281883637.2942.42.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:55293 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313Ab0HPJxa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:53:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1281883637.2942.42.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le dimanche 15 aou^t 2010 a` 12:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet a =E9crit : =2E.. > [PATCH] netfilter: {ip,ip6,arp}_tables: avoid lockdep false positive >=20 > After commit 24b36f019 (netfilter: {ip,ip6,arp}_tables: dont block > bottom half more than necessary), lockdep can raise a warning > because we attempt to lock a spinlock with BH enabled, while > the same lock is usually locked by another cpu in a softirq context. Btw, could you remind us how get_counters() are serialized (I guess you can't have them on 2 cpus at the same time)? Thanks, Jarek P.