From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [held lock freed] Re: [GIT] Networking Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20110321161627.GB28580@elte.hu> References: <20110320.195156.226769634.davem@davemloft.net> <201103211550.10694.arnd@arndb.de> <1300719332.2884.370.camel@edumazet-laptop> <201103211622.40851.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103211622.40851.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c > > > index 4680b1e..b2cf1db 100644 > > > --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c > > > +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c > > > @@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ static int x25_release(struct socket *sock) > > > > > > sock_orphan(sk); > > > out: > > > - release_sock(sk); > > > sock_put(sk); > > > + release_sock(sk); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > > Hmm, x25_release() looks fine, I believe no fix is needed. > > > > D'oh. You're right of course. My patch would introduce the bug, > not fix it. Updated patch below. > > Arnd > 8<------------------------- > net/appletalk: fix atalk_release use after free > > The BKL removal in appletalk introduced a use-after-free problem, > where atalk_destroy_socket frees a sock, but we still release > the socket lock on it. > > An easy fix is to take an extra reference on the sock and sock_put > it when returning from atalk_release. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > index 3d4f4b0..206e771 100644 > --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c > +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c > @@ -1051,6 +1051,7 @@ static int atalk_release(struct socket *sock) > { > struct sock *sk = sock->sk; > > + sock_hold(sk); > lock_sock(sk); > if (sk) { > sock_orphan(sk); > @@ -1058,6 +1059,8 @@ static int atalk_release(struct socket *sock) > atalk_destroy_socket(sk); > } > release_sock(sk); > + sock_put(sk); > + > return 0; > } I have not triggered the lockdep warning in this code yet - but i've ran the patch and have seen no ill effects from it so far. Thanks, Ingo