From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: recvmsg: Unconditionally zero struct sockaddr_storage
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 07:49:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101064954.GC1585@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171031161445.GA140874@beast>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:14:45AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index c729625eb5d3..34183f4fbdf8 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -2188,6 +2188,7 @@ static int ___sys_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct user_msghdr __user *msg,
> struct sockaddr __user *uaddr;
> int __user *uaddr_len = COMPAT_NAMELEN(msg);
>
> + memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
> msg_sys->msg_name = &addr;
Isn't this going to cause a performance hit in the fast path ? Just
checking, I have not read the whole code with the patch in its context.
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 16:14 [PATCH] net: recvmsg: Unconditionally zero struct sockaddr_storage Kees Cook
2017-10-31 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-11-01 12:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-01 18:23 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-15 8:22 ` Alexander Potapenko
2017-11-16 4:17 ` [PATCH net] net/sctp: Always set scope_id in sctp_inet6_skb_msgname Eric W. Biederman
2017-11-16 14:00 ` David Miller
2017-11-15 2:13 ` [PATCH] net: recvmsg: Unconditionally zero struct sockaddr_storage Kees Cook
2017-11-15 18:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-31 17:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2017-11-01 6:49 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171101064954.GC1585@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).