netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: doronrk@fb.com, tom@quantonium.net, davejwatson@fb.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kcm: remove any offset before parsing messages
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 04:58:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918025837.GA3548@nautica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917.195150.315319338322641005.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote on Mon, Sep 17, 2018:
> > No, they can see it, so it's possible to make a KCM program that works
> > right now if you are careful (I'm not sure why the offset within bpf is
> > different from the offset in the kernel though, it looks like the bpf
> > program skips the qos part of the control buffer)
> 
> What helper is used in the BPF program to get this offset value?
> 
> (also good info to add to the commit message)

Dave defined one himself ; for a simple protocol where the offset is in
the first four bytes of the message.

The whole bpf program could look like this:

------
struct kcm_rx_msg { int full_len; int offset; };
static inline struct kcm_rx_msg *kcm_rx_msg(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
	return (struct kcm_rx_msg *)skb->cb;
}
int decode_framing(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
	return load_word(skb, kcm_rx_msg(skb)->offset);
}
------

If we go towards documenting it, adding a helper would be useful yes;
buf if we pull that becomes unnecessary.
(I'll add the example program in the commit message anyway at your
suggestion)

-- 
Dominique Martinet

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-18  2:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-11  9:21 [PATCH v2] kcm: remove any offset before parsing messages Dominique Martinet
2018-09-12  5:36 ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18  1:45   ` David Miller
2018-09-18  1:57     ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18  2:40       ` David Miller
2018-09-18  2:45         ` Dominique Martinet
2018-09-18  2:51           ` David Miller
2018-09-18  2:58             ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2018-10-31  2:56       ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15  1:00         ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15  1:20           ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15  1:57             ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15  2:48               ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15  3:31                 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-15  4:01                   ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-15  4:52                     ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-20  4:11                       ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-20 16:18                         ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-21  8:22                           ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-22 19:24                             ` Tom Herbert
2019-02-22 20:27                               ` Dominique Martinet
2019-02-22 21:01                                 ` Tom Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180918025837.GA3548@nautica \
    --to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=doronrk@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@quantonium.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).