From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABFCC282CB for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABE521773 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="F+Pt+dlN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727121AbfBIQZv (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2019 11:25:51 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:45238 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726907AbfBIQZu (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2019 11:25:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4xAdeiinY4nqo5YAnCCzTDhCcsuRsXI+5omS6I43QqE=; b=F+Pt+dlNLoSmqzriwIIiyFJMW4 Jnqa4oeQBOup83wf/hjEYcUMoRPNligXGfVYTE95mFyYrRY1c/ibBPFoWTV34YQtS80++ZCZYmYzg W0AvI0C1Dppm5PQtqN7gvfoDMoA7x3tm91kcwmlPTREhNImqvWCVutaT+rsHPrXV75EI=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsVRp-00089Y-RA; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:25:45 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:25:45 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: Maxime Chevallier , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine Tenart , thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET PHYs Message-ID: <20190209162545.GA30856@lunn.ch> References: <20190207094939.27369-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > I'd propose that you extract generic patches being submission-ready > and split the patch series into two. I think the following patches > would be candidates for the first series: 2, 3, 5, 6 > (provided they have no dependency on the other patches) > Based on that both of us can go on with our work. > > Andrew, what do you think? Yes, that would help. Heiner, can you also submit the .get_features patches soon. That is another important piece of the puzzle for both drivers. Thanks Andrew