netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jhs@mojatatu.com" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	"xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"john.hurley@netronome.com" <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: flower: insert filter to ht before offloading it to hw
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:09:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410090905.248bf773@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vbfpnpt4znd.fsf@mellanox.com>

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:02:17 +0000, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> On Wed 10 Apr 2019 at 18:48, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:53:53 +0000, Vlad Buslov wrote:  
> >> >> For my next patch set that unlocks the offloads API I implemented the
> >> >> algorithm to track reoffload count for each tp that works like this:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. struct tcf_proto is extended with reoffload_count counter that
> >> >>    incremented each time reoffload is called on particular tp instance.
> >> >>    Counter is protected by tp->lock.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2. struct cls_fl_filter is also extended with reoffload_count counter.
> >> >>    Its value is set to current tp->reoffload_count when offloading the
> >> >>    filter.
> >> >>
> >> >> 3. After offloading the filter, but before inserting it to idr,
> >> >>    f->reoffload_count is compared with tp->reoffload_count. If values
> >> >>    don't match, filter is deleted and -EAGAIN is returned. Cls API
> >> >>    retries filter insertion on -EAGAIN.  
> >> >
> >> > Sounds good for add.  Does this solve delete case as well?
> >> >
> >> >    CPU 0                       CPU 1
> >> >
> >> > __fl_delete
> >> >   IDR remove
> >> >                            cb unregister
> >> >                              hw delete all flows  <- doesn't see the
> >> >                                                      remove in progress
> >> >
> >> >   hw delete  <- doesn't see
> >> >                 the removed cb  
> >>
> >> Thanks for pointing that out! Looks like I need to move call to hw
> >> delete in __fl_delete() function to be executed before idr removal.  
> >
> > Ack, plus you need to do the same retry mechanism.  Save CB "count"/seq,
> > hw delete, remove from IDR, if CB "count"/seq changed hw delete again.
> > Right?  
> 
> Actually, I intended to modify fl_reoffload() to ignore filters with
> 'deleted' flag set when adding, but I guess reusing 'reoffload_count' to
> retry fl_hw_destroy_filter() would also work.

Yeah, I don't see how you can ignore deleted safely.  Perhaps lack of
coffee :)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-05 17:56 [PATCH net-next] net: sched: flower: insert filter to ht before offloading it to hw Vlad Buslov
2019-04-06  5:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-04-08  2:34 ` David Miller
2019-04-08 22:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-09  8:23   ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-09 17:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-10 14:53       ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-10 15:48         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-10 16:02           ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-10 16:09             ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-04-10 16:26               ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-10 17:00                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-16 14:20                   ` [RFC PATCH net-next] net: sched: flower: refactor reoffload for concurrent access Vlad Buslov
2019-04-16 21:49                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-17  7:29                       ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-17 16:34                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-17 17:01                           ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-18 16:33                           ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-18 17:46                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-18 17:58                               ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-18 18:02                                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-18 18:13                                   ` Vlad Buslov
2019-04-18 18:15                                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-11 11:13 ` [PATCH net-next] net: sched: flower: insert filter to ht before offloading it to hw Ido Schimmel
2019-04-11 11:28   ` Vlad Buslov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410090905.248bf773@cakuba.netronome.com \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladbu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).