netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: sean.wang@mediatek.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	davem@davemloft.net, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
	vivien.didelot@gmail.com, frank-w@public-files.de,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add mediatek,ephy-handle to isolate ext. phy
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:30:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625093042.Horde._8BNPFSzW6B9-CI8P6akHTh@www.vdorst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6175753-eb99-63e5-767e-f82becbf8d1a@gmail.com>

Quoting Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>:

Hi Florian

> On 6/24/19 7:52 AM, René van Dorst wrote:
>> On some platforum the external phy can only interface to the port 5 of the
>> switch because the RGMII TX and RX lines are swapped. But it still can be
>> useful to use the internal phy of the switch to act as a WAN port which
>> connectes to the 2nd GMAC. This gives WAN port dedicated bandwidth to
>> the SOC. This increases the LAN and WAN routing.
>>
>> By adding the optional property mediatek,ephy-handle, the external phy
>> is put in isolation mode when internal phy is connected to 2nd GMAC via
>> phy-handle property.
>
> Most platforms we have seen so far implement this logic with a mdio-mux,
> can you see if that is possible here? stmmac has plenty of examples like
> those.

May I don't understand it correctly, but all the devices are on the same MDIO
bus.
I tried to make a ASCII diagram to make it a bit more clear.

  +-------------------+                     
+----------------------------------------------+
  | SOC MT7621/3      |                    | MT7530 SWITCH              
                    |
  |   +-------------+ |(T)RGMII BUS        |  +-------------+    
INTERNAL                  |
  |   |  1st GMAC   <------------------------->  PORT 6     |   MII  
BUS  +----------+     |
  |   +-------------+ |                    |  +-------------+      
+------>  GMAC5   |     |
  |                   |                    |                      |     
   +----------+     |
  |   +-------------+ | RGMII BUS          |  +-------------+     |     
                    |
  |   |  2nd GMAC   <------------------+------>  PORT 5     +-----+     
   +----------+     |
  |   +-------------+ |                |   |  +-------------+      
+------>  PHY P0  +<--+ |
  |                   |                |   |                      |     
   +----------+   | |
  |   +-------------+ |  MDIO BUS      |   |                      |     
                  | |
  |   |  MDIO       +--------+         |   |                      |     
   +----------+   | |
  |   +-------------+ |      |         |   |                       
+------>  PHY P4  +<--+ |
  |                   |      |         |   |                            
   +----------+   | |
  +-------------------+      |         |    
+--------------------------------------------|-+
                             |         |       +-------------+          
                  |
                             |         |       |  EXTERNAL   |          
                  |
                             |         +------->  PHY AT8033 | SGMII  
BUS +----------+   |
                             |                 |              
+-----------> SFP CAGE |   |
                             +---------------->+             |          
   +----------+   |
                             |                 |             |          
                  |
                             |                 +-------------+          
                  |
                              
+----------------------------------------------------------+

I don't see why I need a MDIO mux. Devices; 2nd GMAC, external phy and port 5
share the same RGMII bus. Depending on the port 5 mux settings, port 5  
is acting
as a GMAC of PHY of port 0/4. As long as the unused devices doesn't drive the
RGMII bus we are good.

2nd GMAC RGMII control is currently set with a pinctrl "RGMII2".
Port 5 and external phy are done in mt7530_port5_setup() depending on the
device-tree.

Greats,

René

> --
> Florian




  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24 14:52 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] net: dsa: MT7530: Convert to PHYLINK and add support for port 5 René van Dorst
2019-06-24 14:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK API René van Dorst
2019-06-24 15:39   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25 11:31     ` René van Dorst
2019-06-25 12:10       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25 18:37         ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-25 19:02           ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-25 19:27             ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-25 20:41               ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-25 21:07                 ` René van Dorst
2019-06-25 21:21                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-27 19:09                 ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-27 19:28                   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-28  7:16                     ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-25 21:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25 20:24     ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-06-25 21:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25 22:14         ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-06-25 22:57           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25 23:10             ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-06-25 23:13               ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-06-26  1:52                 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-26  7:41               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-26  8:46                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-06-26  9:04                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-25  0:58   ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-25 11:43     ` René van Dorst
2019-06-24 14:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5 René van Dorst
2019-06-24 14:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] " René van Dorst
2019-06-24 14:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mt7530: Add mediatek,ephy-handle to isolate ext. phy René van Dorst
2019-06-24 21:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-25  9:30     ` René van Dorst [this message]
2019-06-25 19:16       ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-24 14:52 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] net: dsa: mt7530: Add mediatek,ephy-handle to isolate external phy René van Dorst
2019-06-24 21:52   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-25  0:22     ` Daniel Santos
2019-06-25  8:24     ` René van Dorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190625093042.Horde._8BNPFSzW6B9-CI8P6akHTh@www.vdorst.com \
    --to=opensource@vdorst.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).