From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 09/21] netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: accept duplicate fragments again
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:41:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627004122.21671-9-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627004122.21671-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 8a3dca632538c550930ce8bafa8c906b130d35cf ]
When fixing the skb leak introduced by the conversion to rbtree, I
forgot about the special case of duplicate fragments. The condition
under the 'insert_error' label isn't effective anymore as
nf_ct_frg6_gather() doesn't override the returned value anymore. So
duplicate fragments now get NF_DROP verdict.
To accept duplicate fragments again, handle them specially as soon as
inet_frag_queue_insert() reports them. Return -EINPROGRESS which will
translate to NF_STOLEN verdict, like any accepted fragment. However,
such packets don't carry any new information and aren't queued, so we
just drop them immediately.
Fixes: a0d56cb911ca ("netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: fix leakage of unqueued fragments")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index e6114a6710e0..0b53d1907e4a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -264,8 +264,14 @@ static int nf_ct_frag6_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
prev = fq->q.fragments_tail;
err = inet_frag_queue_insert(&fq->q, skb, offset, end);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ if (err == IPFRAG_DUP) {
+ /* No error for duplicates, pretend they got queued. */
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+ }
goto insert_error;
+ }
if (dev)
fq->iif = dev->ifindex;
@@ -303,8 +309,6 @@ static int nf_ct_frag6_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
return -EINPROGRESS;
insert_error:
- if (err == IPFRAG_DUP)
- goto err;
inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
err:
skb_dst_drop(skb);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190627004122.21671-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 02/21] samples, bpf: fix to change the buffer size for read() Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 04/21] mac80211: mesh: fix RCU warning Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 05/21] mac80211: free peer keys before vif down in mesh Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 06/21] mwifiex: Fix possible buffer overflows at parsing bss descriptor Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 07/21] mwifiex: Abort at too short BSS descriptor element Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 08/21] netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: fix leakage of unqueued fragments Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 10/21] dt-bindings: can: mcp251x: add mcp25625 support Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 11/21] can: mcp251x: add support for mcp25625 Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 14/21] mlxsw: spectrum: Disallow prio-tagged packets when PVID is removed Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 17/21] mac80211: only warn once on chanctx_conf being NULL Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 19/21] bnx2x: Check if transceiver implements DDM before access Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 20/21] ip6_tunnel: allow not to count pkts on tstats by passing dev as NULL Sasha Levin
2019-06-27 0:41 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 21/21] net :sunrpc :clnt :Fix xps refcount imbalance on the error path Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627004122.21671-9-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).