From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, grygorii.strashko@ti.com,
saeedm@mellanox.com, leon@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net: core: page_pool: add user cnt preventing pool deletion
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:02:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627220245.GA3269@khorivan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627214317.237e5926@carbon>
Hi Jesper, thanks you remember about it.
>
>I don't think that "create" and "free" routines paring looks "more
>correct" together.
>
>Maybe we can scale back your solution(?), via creating a page_pool_get()
>and page_pool_put() API that can be used by your driver, to keep the
>page_pool object after a xdp_rxq_info_unreg() call. Then you can use
>it for two xdp_rxq_info structs, and call page_pool_put() after you
>have unregistered both.
>
>The API would basically be:
>
>diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
>index b366f59885c1..691ddacfb5a6 100644
>--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
>+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
>@@ -357,6 +357,10 @@ static void __warn_in_flight(struct page_pool *pool)
> void __page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> {
> WARN(pool->alloc.count, "API usage violation");
>+
>+ if (atomic_read(&pool->user_cnt) != 0)
>+ return;
>+
> WARN(!ptr_ring_empty(&pool->ring), "ptr_ring is not empty");
>
> /* Can happen due to forced shutdown */
>@@ -372,6 +376,19 @@ void __page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__page_pool_free);
>
>+void page_pool_put(struct page_pool *pool)
>+{
>+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&pool->user_cnt))
>+ __page_pool_free(pool);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_put);
>+
>+void page_pool_get(struct page_pool *pool)
>+{
>+ atomic_inc(&pool->user_cnt);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_get);
>+
I have another solution that doesn't touch page pool and adds modifications
to xdp allocator. As for me it looks better and work wider, I don't need to
think about this in the driver also.
It's supposed allocator works as before, no any changes to mlx5 and
page_pool API and its usage and seems like fits your requirements.
It still supposes that allocator runs under same napi softirq but allows
to reuse allocator.
I have not verified yet, but looks like:
diff --git a/include/net/xdp_priv.h b/include/net/xdp_priv.h
index 6a8cba6ea79a..995b21da2f27 100644
--- a/include/net/xdp_priv.h
+++ b/include/net/xdp_priv.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct xdp_mem_allocator {
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct delayed_work defer_wq;
unsigned long defer_warn;
+ unsigned long refcnt;
};
#endif /* __LINUX_NET_XDP_PRIV_H__ */
diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
index f98ab6b98674..6239483e3793 100644
--- a/net/core/xdp.c
+++ b/net/core/xdp.c
@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static bool __mem_id_disconnect(int id, bool force)
WARN(1, "Request remove non-existing id(%d), driver bug?", id);
return true;
}
+
+ if (--xa->refcnt) {
+ mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
+ return true;
+ }
+
xa->disconnect_cnt++;
/* Detects in-flight packet-pages for page_pool */
@@ -312,6 +318,33 @@ static bool __is_supported_mem_type(enum xdp_mem_type type)
return true;
}
+static struct xdp_mem_allocator *xdp_allocator_get(void *allocator)
+{
+ struct xdp_mem_allocator *xae, *xa == NULL;
+ struct rhashtable_iter iter;
+
+ mutex_lock(&mem_id_lock);
+ rhashtable_walk_enter(mem_id_ht, &iter);
+ do {
+ rhashtable_walk_start(&iter);
+
+ while ((xae = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter)) && !IS_ERR(xae)) {
+ if (xae->allocator == allocator) {
+ xae->refcnt++;
+ xa = xae;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);
+
+ } while (xae == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
+ rhashtable_walk_exit(&iter);
+ mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
+
+ return xa;
+}
+
int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
enum xdp_mem_type type, void *allocator)
{
@@ -347,6 +380,9 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
}
}
+ if (xdp_allocator_get(allocator))
+ return 0;
+
xdp_alloc = kzalloc(sizeof(*xdp_alloc), gfp);
if (!xdp_alloc)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -360,6 +396,7 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
xdp_rxq->mem.id = id;
xdp_alloc->mem = xdp_rxq->mem;
xdp_alloc->allocator = allocator;
+ xdp_alloc->refcnt = 1;
/* Insert allocator into ID lookup table */
ptr = rhashtable_insert_slow(mem_id_ht, &id, &xdp_alloc->node);
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 17:59 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/4] net: core: page_pool: add user cnt preventing pool deletion Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 1:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-26 14:01 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 10:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-26 10:49 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 11:51 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-26 12:39 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-27 19:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-27 22:02 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk [this message]
2019-06-28 6:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-06-28 8:53 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: add dma mapped submit Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: return handler status Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-26 2:17 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-06-25 20:46 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627220245.GA3269@khorivan \
--to=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).