netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sdf@google.com
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: Add link-based BPF program attachment to network namespace
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 10:48:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527174805.GG49942@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527170840.1768178-6-jakub@cloudflare.com>

On 05/27, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> Add support for bpf() syscall subcommands that operate on
> bpf_link (LINK_CREATE, LINK_UPDATE, OBJ_GET_INFO) for attach points tied  
> to
> network namespaces (that is flow dissector at the moment).

> Link-based and prog-based attachment can be used interchangeably, but only
> one can be in use at a time. Attempts to attach a link when a prog is
> already attached directly, and the other way around, will be met with
> -EBUSY.

> Attachment of multiple links of same attach type to one netns is not
> supported, with the intention to lift it when a use-case presents
> itself. Because of that attempts to create a netns link, when one already
> exists result in -E2BIG error, signifying that there is no space left for
> another attachment.

> Link-based attachments to netns don't keep a netns alive by holding a ref
> to it. Instead links get auto-detached from netns when the latter is being
> destroyed by a pernet pre_exit callback.

> When auto-detached, link lives in defunct state as long there are open FDs
> for it. -ENOLINK is returned if a user tries to update a defunct link.

> Because bpf_link to netns doesn't hold a ref to struct net, special care  
> is
> taken when releasing the link. The netns might be getting torn down when
> the release function tries to access it to detach the link.

> To ensure the struct net object is alive when release function accesses it
> we rely on the fact that cleanup_net(), struct net destructor, calls
> synchronize_rcu() after invoking pre_exit callbacks. If auto-detach from
> pre_exit happens first, link release will not attempt to access struct  
> net.

> Same applies the other way around, network namespace doesn't keep an
> attached link alive because by not holding a ref to it. Instead bpf_links
> to netns are RCU-freed, so that pernet pre_exit callback can safely access
> and auto-detach the link when racing with link release/free.

[..]
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>   	for (type = 0; type < MAX_NETNS_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE; type++) {
> -		if (rcu_access_pointer(net->bpf.progs[type]))
> +		if (rcu_access_pointer(net->bpf.links[type]))
> +			bpf_netns_link_auto_detach(net, type);
> +		else if (rcu_access_pointer(net->bpf.progs[type]))
>   			__netns_bpf_prog_detach(net, type);
>   	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
Aren't you doing RCU_INIT_POINTER in __netns_bpf_prog_detach?
Is it allowed under rcu_read_load?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-27 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27 17:08 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Link-based program attachment to network namespaces Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] flow_dissector: Don't grab update-side lock on prog detach from pre_exit Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:35   ` sdf
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] flow_dissector: Pull locking up from prog attach callback Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:35   ` sdf
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] net: Introduce netns_bpf for BPF programs attached to netns Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:40   ` sdf
2020-05-27 19:31     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 20:36       ` sdf
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] flow_dissector: Move out netns_bpf prog callbacks Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: Add link-based BPF program attachment to network namespace Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:48   ` sdf [this message]
2020-05-27 19:54     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 20:38       ` sdf
2020-05-28 10:34         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 20:53   ` sdf
2020-05-28 11:03     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28 16:09       ` sdf
2020-05-28  2:54   ` kbuild test robot
2020-06-04 23:38     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 14:41       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28  5:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-28 12:26     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28 18:09       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-28 18:48         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-28 13:30   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] libbpf: Add support for bpf_link-based netns attachment Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28  5:59   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-28 13:05     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] bpftool: Support link show for netns-attached links Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28  6:02   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-28 13:10     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-27 17:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests for attaching bpf_link to netns Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28  6:08   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-28 13:29     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-28 18:31       ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200527174805.GG49942@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).