Hi Alexander, thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts. On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > Rationale: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@lwn.net/ I think we need some text here. Clicking on a link to understand what a patch is about is not comfortable. You can add the link with a Link: tag for additional information. Removing stale email addresses may have some value, but removing... > Compaq's Bootldr + John Dorsey's patch for Assabet support > -(http://www.handhelds.org/Compaq/bootldr.html) ... information like this is not good. 'Wayback machine' still has copies in case someone wants to look at where the infos came from. > - * Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell > + * Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell This is an OK case in my book... > -MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell "); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell"); ... same here ... > @@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ > case a PCI bridge (DEC chip 21152). The value of > 'pb' is now only initialized if a de4x5 chip is > present. > - This is kind of a signature and should be kept IMO. > * 2001/07/23: > - * - Hand merge version from handhelds.org CVS tree. See patch > + * - Hand merge version from CVS tree. See patch That information may be useful. > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > /* -*- linux-c -*- > - * > - * (C) 2003 zecke@handhelds.org Removing copyright is a bad idea. Probably some comment blocks are cruft meanwhile and can be removed as a whole. That can be discussed. But removing only the handhelds.org part makes most parts worse IMHO. Thanks and happy hacking, Wolfram