From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:10:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716125723.GA19500@laureti-dev>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 02:57:24PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> When doing "ip link set dev ... up" for a ksz9477 backed link,
> ksz9477_phy_setup is called and it calls phy_remove_link_mode to remove
> 1000baseT HDX. During phy_remove_link_mode, phy_advertise_supported is
> called. Doing so reverts any previous change to advertised link modes
> e.g. using a udevd .link file.
>
> phy_remove_link_mode is not meant to be used while opening a link and
> should be called during phy probe when the link is not yet available to
> userspace.
>
> Therefore move the phy_remove_link_mode calls into ksz9477_setup. This
> is called during dsa_switch_register and thus comes after
> ksz9477_switch_detect, which initializes dev->features.
>
> Remove phy_setup from ksz_dev_ops as no users remain.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200715192722.GD1256692@lunn.ch/
> Fixes: 42fc6a4c613019 ("net: dsa: microchip: prepare PHY for proper advertisement")
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 31 ++++++++++----------------
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 2 --
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> changes since v1:
> * Don't change phy_remove_link_mode. Instead, call it at the right
> time. Thanks to Andrew Lunn for the detailed explanation.
>
> Helmut
Hi Helmut
This change looks better.
However, i'm having trouble understanding how PHYs actually work in
this driver.
We have:
struct ksz_port {
u16 member;
u16 vid_member;
int stp_state;
struct phy_device phydev;
with an instance of this structure per port of the switch.
And it is this phydev which you are manipulating.
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> + /* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> + phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> +
> + /* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> + if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> + phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
But how is this phydev associated with the netdev? I don't see how
phylink_connect_phy() is called using this phydev structure?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 8:25 [PATCH] net: phy: phy_remove_link_mode should not advertise new modes Helmut Grohne
2020-07-14 21:07 ` David Miller
2020-07-15 7:03 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-15 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-15 19:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 18:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 19:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-16 12:57 ` [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe Helmut Grohne
2020-07-16 14:10 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-07-17 8:18 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-17 13:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-20 9:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-20 20:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 11:07 ` [PATCH v4] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-21 15:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 22:50 ` David Miller
2020-07-20 21:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 7:38 ` Helmut Grohne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).