netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:10:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716125723.GA19500@laureti-dev>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 02:57:24PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> When doing "ip link set dev ... up" for a ksz9477 backed link,
> ksz9477_phy_setup is called and it calls phy_remove_link_mode to remove
> 1000baseT HDX. During phy_remove_link_mode, phy_advertise_supported is
> called. Doing so reverts any previous change to advertised link modes
> e.g. using a udevd .link file.
> 
> phy_remove_link_mode is not meant to be used while opening a link and
> should be called during phy probe when the link is not yet available to
> userspace.
> 
> Therefore move the phy_remove_link_mode calls into ksz9477_setup. This
> is called during dsa_switch_register and thus comes after
> ksz9477_switch_detect, which initializes dev->features.
> 
> Remove phy_setup from ksz_dev_ops as no users remain.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200715192722.GD1256692@lunn.ch/
> Fixes: 42fc6a4c613019 ("net: dsa: microchip: prepare PHY for proper advertisement")
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c    | 31 ++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c |  2 --
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h |  2 --
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> changes since v1:
>  * Don't change phy_remove_link_mode. Instead, call it at the right
>    time. Thanks to Andrew Lunn for the detailed explanation.
> 
> Helmut

Hi Helmut

This change looks better.

However, i'm having trouble understanding how PHYs actually work in
this driver. 

We have:

struct ksz_port {
        u16 member;
        u16 vid_member;
        int stp_state;
        struct phy_device phydev;

with an instance of this structure per port of the switch.

And it is this phydev which you are manipulating.

> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> +		/* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> +		phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> +				     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> +
> +		/* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> +		if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> +			phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> +					     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;

But how is this phydev associated with the netdev? I don't see how
phylink_connect_phy() is called using this phydev structure?

      Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14  8:25 [PATCH] net: phy: phy_remove_link_mode should not advertise new modes Helmut Grohne
2020-07-14 21:07 ` David Miller
2020-07-15  7:03   ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-15 18:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-15 19:01       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 18:51     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 19:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-16 12:57   ` [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe Helmut Grohne
2020-07-16 14:10     ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-07-17  8:18       ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-17 13:18         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-20  9:04           ` [PATCH v3] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-20 20:43             ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 11:07               ` [PATCH v4] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-21 15:20                 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 22:50                 ` David Miller
2020-07-20 21:04             ` [PATCH v3] " Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21  7:38               ` Helmut Grohne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).