netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix spurious test failures in core_retro selftest
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:49:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731204957.2047119-1-andriin@fb.com> (raw)

core_retro selftest uses BPF program that's triggered on sys_enter
system-wide, but has no protection from some unrelated process doing syscall
while selftest is running. This leads to occasional test failures with
unexpected PIDs being returned. Fix that by filtering out all processes that
are not test_progs process.

Fixes: fcda189a5133 ("selftests/bpf: Add test relying only on CO-RE and no recent kernel features")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_retro.c |  8 ++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_retro.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_retro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_retro.c
index 78e30d3a23d5..6acb0e94d4d7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_retro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_retro.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 void test_core_retro(void)
 {
-	int err, zero = 0, res, duration = 0;
+	int err, zero = 0, res, duration = 0, my_pid = getpid();
 	struct test_core_retro *skel;
 
 	/* load program */
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ void test_core_retro(void)
 	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "skeleton open/load failed\n"))
 		goto out_close;
 
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.exp_tgid_map), &zero, &my_pid, 0);
+	if (CHECK(err, "map_update", "failed to set expected PID: %d\n", errno))
+		goto out_close;
+
 	/* attach probe */
 	err = test_core_retro__attach(skel);
 	if (CHECK(err, "attach_kprobe", "err %d\n", err))
@@ -26,7 +30,7 @@ void test_core_retro(void)
 	if (CHECK(err, "map_lookup", "failed to lookup result: %d\n", errno))
 		goto out_close;
 
-	CHECK(res != getpid(), "pid_check", "got %d != exp %d\n", res, getpid());
+	CHECK(res != my_pid, "pid_check", "got %d != exp %d\n", res, my_pid);
 
 out_close:
 	test_core_retro__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_retro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_retro.c
index 75c60c3c29cf..20861ec2f674 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_retro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_retro.c
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ struct task_struct {
 	int tgid;
 } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} exp_tgid_map SEC(".maps");
+
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
 	__uint(max_entries, 1);
@@ -21,6 +28,12 @@ int handle_sys_enter(void *ctx)
 	struct task_struct *task = (void *)bpf_get_current_task();
 	int tgid = BPF_CORE_READ(task, tgid);
 	int zero = 0;
+	int real_tgid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+	int *exp_tgid = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&exp_tgid_map, &zero);
+
+	/* only pass through sys_enters from test process */
+	if (!exp_tgid || *exp_tgid != real_tgid)
+		return 0;
 
 	bpf_map_update_elem(&results, &zero, &tgid, 0);
 
-- 
2.24.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-31 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-31 20:49 Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix spurious test failures in core_retro selftest John Fastabend
2020-08-02  6:20   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200731204957.2047119-1-andriin@fb.com \
    --to=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).