From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Amit Kucheria" <amitk@kernel.org>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"MTD Maling List" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux I2C" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Khuong Dinh" <khuong@os.amperecomputing.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Matthias Schiffer" <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
"Kamal Dasu" <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux PWM List" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
"Saravanan Sekar" <sravanhome@gmail.com>,
"Corey Minyard" <minyard@acm.org>,
"Linux PM list" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"John Garry" <john.garry@huawei.com>,
"Peter Korsgaard" <peter@korsgaard.com>,
"William Breathitt Gray" <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Mun Yew Tham" <mun.yew.tham@intel.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Linux MMC List" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Joakim Zhang" <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Sergey Shtylyov" <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Zha Qipeng" <qipeng.zha@intel.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@kernel.org>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:06:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117170609.yxaamvqdkivs56ju@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWCKERO20R2iVHq8P=BaoauoBAtiampWzfMRYihi3Sb0g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12940 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 02:08:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:49 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:24 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 09:41:42AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 9:22 PM Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> wrote:
> > > > > > On 1/14/22 11:22 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > > > You have to understand that for clk (and regulator and gpiod) NULL is a
> > > > > > > valid descriptor that can actually be used, it just has no effect. So
> > > > > > > this is a convenience value for the case "If the clk/regulator/gpiod in
> > > > > > > question isn't available, there is nothing to do". This is what makes
> > > > > > > clk_get_optional() and the others really useful and justifies their
> > > > > > > existence. This doesn't apply to platform_get_irq_optional().
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do understand that. However, IRQs are a different beast with their
> > > > > > own justifications...
> > > > >
> > > > > > > clk_get_optional() is sane and sensible for cases where the clk might be
> > > > > > > absent and it helps you because you don't have to differentiate between
> > > > > > > "not found" and "there is an actual resource".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The reason for platform_get_irq_optional()'s existence is just that
> > > > > > > platform_get_irq() emits an error message which is wrong or suboptimal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think you are very wrong here. The real reason is to simplify the
> > > > > > callers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed.
> > > >
> > > > The commit that introduced platform_get_irq_optional() said:
> > > >
> > > > Introduce a new platform_get_irq_optional() that works much like
> > > > platform_get_irq() but does not output an error on failure to
> > > > find the interrupt.
> > > >
> > > > So the author of 8973ea47901c81a1912bd05f1577bed9b5b52506 failed to
> > > > mention the real reason? Or look at
> > > > 31a8d8fa84c51d3ab00bf059158d5de6178cf890:
> > > >
> > > > [...] use platform_get_irq_optional() to get second/third IRQ
> > > > which are optional to avoid below error message during probe:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Look through the output of
> > > >
> > > > git log -Splatform_get_irq_optional
> > > >
> > > > to find several more of these.
> > >
> > > Commit 8973ea47901c81a1 ("driver core: platform: Introduce
> > > platform_get_irq_optional()") and the various fixups fixed the ugly
> > > printing of error messages that were not applicable.
> > > In hindsight, probably commit 7723f4c5ecdb8d83 ("driver core:
> > > platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*()") should have
> > > been reverted instead, until a platform_get_irq_optional() with proper
> > > semantics was introduced.
> >
> > ack.
> >
> > > But as we were all in a hurry to kill the non-applicable error
> > > message, we went for the quick and dirty fix.
> > >
> > > > Also I fail to see how a caller of (today's) platform_get_irq_optional()
> > > > is simpler than a caller of platform_get_irq() given that there is no
> > > > semantic difference between the two. Please show me a single
> > > > conversion from platform_get_irq to platform_get_irq_optional that
> > > > yielded a simplification.
> > >
> > > That's exactly why we want to change the latter to return 0 ;-)
> >
> > OK. So you agree to my statement "The reason for
> > platform_get_irq_optional()'s existence is just that platform_get_irq()
> > emits an error message [...]". Actually you don't want to oppose but
> > say: It's unfortunate that the silent variant of platform_get_irq() took
> > the obvious name of a function that could have an improved return code
> > semantic.
> >
> > So my suggestion to rename todays platform_get_irq_optional() to
> > platform_get_irq_silently() and then introducing
> > platform_get_irq_optional() with your suggested semantic seems
> > intriguing and straigt forward to me.
>
> I don't really see the point of needing platform_get_irq_silently(),
> unless as an intermediary step, where it's going to be removed again
> once the conversion has completed.
We agree that one of the two functions is enough, just differ in which
of the two we want to have. :-)
If you think platform_get_irq_silently() is a good intermediate step for
your goal, then we agree to rename platform_get_irq_optional(). So I
suggest you ack my patch.
> Still, the rename would touch all users at once anyway.
It would be more easy to keep the conversion regression-free however. A
plain rename is simple to verify. And then converting to the new
platform_get_irq_optional() can be done individually and without the
need to do everything in a single step.
> > Another thought: platform_get_irq emits an error message for all
> > problems. Wouldn't it be consistent to let platform_get_irq_optional()
> > emit an error message for all problems but "not found"?
> > Alternatively remove the error printk from platform_get_irq().
>
> Yes, all problems but not found are real errors.
If you want to make platform_get_irq and its optional variant more
similar to the others, dropping the error message is the way to go.
> > > > So you need some more effort to convince me of your POV.
> > > >
> > > > > Even for clocks, you cannot assume that you can always blindly use
> > > > > the returned dummy (actually a NULL pointer) to call into the clk
> > > > > API. While this works fine for simple use cases, where you just
> > > > > want to enable/disable an optional clock (clk_prepare_enable() and
> > > > > clk_disable_unprepare()), it does not work for more complex use cases.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed. But for clks and gpiods and regulators the simple case is quite
> > > > usual. For irqs it isn't.
> > >
> > > It is for devices that can have either separate interrupts, or a single
> > > multiplexed interrupt.
> > >
> > > The logic in e.g. drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c and
> > > drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c could be simplified and improved (currently
> > > it doesn't handle deferred probe) if platform_get_irq_optional()
> > > would return 0 instead of -ENXIO.
> >
> > Looking at sh-sci.c the irq handling logic could be improved even
> > without a changed platform_get_irq_optional():
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > index 968967d722d4..c7dc9fb84844 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> > @@ -2873,11 +2873,13 @@ static int sci_init_single(struct platform_device *dev,
> > * interrupt ID numbers, or muxed together with another interrupt.
> > */
> > if (sci_port->irqs[0] < 0)
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > + return sci_port->irqs[0];
> >
> > - if (sci_port->irqs[1] < 0)
> > + if (sci_port->irqs[1] == -ENXIO)
> > for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sci_port->irqs); i++)
> > sci_port->irqs[i] = sci_port->irqs[0];
> > + else if (sci_port->irqs[1] < 0)
> > + return sci_port->irqs[1];
> >
> > sci_port->params = sci_probe_regmap(p);
> > if (unlikely(sci_port->params == NULL))
> >
> > And then the code flow is actively irritating. sci_init_single() copies
> > irqs[0] to all other irqs[i] and then sci_request_irq() loops over the
> > already requested irqs and checks for duplicates. A single place that
> > identifies the exact set of required irqs would already help a lot.
>
> Yeah, it's ugly and convoluted, like the wide set of hardware the
> driver supports.
>
> > Also for spi-rspi.c I don't see how platform_get_irq_byname_optional()
> > returning 0 instead of -ENXIO would help. Please talk in patches.
>
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
> @@ -1420,17 +1420,25 @@ static int rspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ctlr->max_native_cs = rspi->ops->num_hw_ss;
>
> ret = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "rx");
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error2;
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> ret = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "mux");
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (!ret)
> ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error2;
> +
> if (ret >= 0)
> rspi->rx_irq = rspi->tx_irq = ret;
> } else {
> rspi->rx_irq = ret;
> ret = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "tx");
> - if (ret >= 0)
> - rspi->tx_irq = ret;
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error2;
> +
> + rspi->tx_irq = ret;
> }
>
> if (rspi->rx_irq == rspi->tx_irq) {
This is not a simplification, just looking at the line count and the
added gotos. That's because it also improves error handling and so the
effect isn't easily spotted.
> I like it when the "if (ret < ) ..." error handling is the first check to do.
That's a relevant difference between us.
> With -ENXIO, it becomes more convoluted. and looks less nice (IMHO).
>
> > Preferably first simplify in-driver logic to make the conversion to the
> > new platform_get_irq_optional() actually reviewable.
>
> So I have to choose between
>
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
> return ret;
>
> if (ret) {
> ...
> }
>
> and
>
> if (ret == -ENXIO) {
> ...
> } else if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> }
I would do the latter, then it's in the normal order for error handling
handle some specific errors;
forward unhandled errors up the stack;
handle success;
but it seems you prefer to not call "not found" an error. Actually I
think it's an advantage that the driver has to mention -ENXIO, feels
like proper error handling to me. I guess we won't agree about that
though.
What about the following idea (in pythonic pseudo code for simplicity):
# the rspi device either has two irqs, one for rx and one for
# tx, or a single one for both together.
def muxed_hander(irq):
status = readl(STATUS)
if status & IF_RX:
rx_handler()
if status & IF_TX:
tx_handler()
def probe_muxed_irq():
irq = platform_get_irq_by_name("mux")
if irq < 0:
return irq;
request_irq(irq, muxed_handler)
def probe_separate_irqs():
txirq = platform_get_irq_by_name("tx")
if txirq < 0:
return txirq
rxirq = platform_get_irq_by_name("rx")
if rxirq < 0:
return rxirq
request_irq(txirq, tx_handler)
request_irq(rxirq, rx_handler)
def probe():
ret = probe_separate_irqs()
if ret == -ENXIO:
ret = probe_muxed_irq()
if ret < 0:
return ret
looks clean (to me that is) and allows to skip the demuxing in
tx_handler and rx_handler (which might or might not yield improved
runtime behaviour). Maybe a bit more verbose, but simpler to grasp for a
human, isn't it?
> with the final target being
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> if (ret) {
> ...
> }
>
> So the first option means the final change is smaller, but it looks less
> nice than the second option (IMHO).
> But the second option means more churn.
>
> > > So there are three reasons: because the absence of an optional IRQ
> > > is not an error, and thus that should not cause (a) an error code
> > > to be returned, and (b) an error message to be printed, and (c)
> > > because it can simplify the logic in device drivers.
> >
> > I don't agree to (a). If the value signaling not-found is -ENXIO or 0
> > (or -ENODEV) doesn't matter much. I wouldn't deviate from the return
> > code semantics of platform_get_irq() just for having to check against 0
> > instead of -ENXIO. Zero is then just another magic value.
>
> Zero is a natural magic value (also for pointers).
> Errors are always negative.
> Positive values are cookies (or pointers) associated with success.
Yeah, the issue where we don't agree is if "not-found" is special enough
to deserve the natural magic value. For me -ENXIO is magic enough to
handle the absence of an irq line. I consider it even the better magic
value.
> > (c) still has to be proven, see above.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220110195449.12448-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
2022-01-10 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-10 20:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-10 21:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-10 21:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-10 21:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-01-12 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-12 8:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-12 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-12 12:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-12 13:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-01-12 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-12 13:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-12 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-12 15:05 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-12 15:13 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-12 15:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-12 16:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-12 21:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-12 21:45 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-13 11:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-13 14:45 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-13 19:43 ` [PATCH] driver core: platform: Rename platform_get_irq_optional() to platform_get_irq_silent() Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-13 20:17 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-13 20:57 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-13 22:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-14 9:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-15 15:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-15 21:06 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-14 11:34 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-13 20:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-13 21:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-13 23:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-14 17:55 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-15 13:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 18:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-19 19:44 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 18:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-14 6:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2022-01-14 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-15 15:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 18:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-19 19:47 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 20:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-20 7:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-24 15:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-24 21:02 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-25 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-25 12:56 ` Matthias Schiffer
2022-01-25 14:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-14 19:45 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-14 20:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-15 13:08 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 18:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-13 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-14 9:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-14 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-14 19:14 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-14 20:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-15 20:22 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-17 8:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-17 9:24 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-17 10:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-17 11:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-17 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-17 17:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2022-01-18 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-18 9:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-18 9:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-18 12:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-18 12:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-18 14:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 16:12 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 18:29 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-20 11:27 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-16 18:15 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-17 8:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-18 20:21 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-18 22:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 15:34 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 18:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-19 19:49 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-14 18:46 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-15 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional (summary) Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-16 14:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-18 9:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-18 9:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-19 10:56 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 11:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 11:42 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 19:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-17 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-19 15:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-01-19 15:50 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-10 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_byname_optional() optional Sergey Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220117170609.yxaamvqdkivs56ju@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=khuong@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mun.yew.tham@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com \
--cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
--cc=sravanhome@gmail.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).