netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Rao shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<syzbot+7f7f201cc2668a8fd169@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net] af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb.
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:10:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240405221057.2406-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)

syzkaller started to report deadlock of unix_gc_lock after commit
4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm."), but
it just uncovers the bug that has been there since commit 314001f0bf92
("af_unix: Add OOB support").

The repro basically does the following.

  from socket import *
  from array import array

  c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
  c1.sendmsg([b'a'], [(SOL_SOCKET, SCM_RIGHTS, array("i", [c2.fileno()]))], MSG_OOB)
  c2.recv(1)  # blocked as no normal data in recv queue

  c2.close()  # done async and unblock recv()
  c1.close()  # done async and trigger GC

A socket sends its file descriptor to itself as OOB data and tries to
receive normal data, but finally recv() fails due to async close().

The problem here is wrong handling of OOB skb in manage_oob().  When
recvmsg() is called without MSG_OOB, manage_oob() is called to check
if the peeked skb is OOB skb.  In such a case, manage_oob() pops it
out of the receive queue but does not clear unix_sock(sk)->oob_skb.
This is wrong in terms of uAPI.

Let's say we send "hello" with MSG_OOB, and "world" without MSG_OOB.
The 'o' is handled as OOB data.  When recv() is called twice without
MSG_OOB, the OOB data should be lost.

  >>> from socket import *
  >>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
  >>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB)  # 'o' is OOB data
  5
  >>> c1.send(b'world')
  5
  >>> c2.recv(5)  # OOB data is not received
  b'hell'
  >>> c2.recv(5)  # OOB date is skipped
  b'world'
  >>> c2.recv(5, MSG_OOB)  # This should return an error
  b'o'

In the same situation, TCP actually returns -EINVAL for the last
recv().

Also, if we do not clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb, unix_poll() always set
EPOLLPRI even though the data has passed through by previous recv().

To avoid these issues, we must clear unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb when dequeuing
it from recv queue.

The reason why the old GC did not trigger the deadlock is because the
old GC relied on the receive queue to detect the loop.

When it is triggered, the socket with OOB data is marked as GC candidate
because file refcount == inflight count (1).  However, after traversing
all inflight sockets, the socket still has a positive inflight count (1),
thus the socket is excluded from candidates.  Then, the old GC lose the
chance to garbage-collect the socket.

With the old GC, the repro continues to create true garbage that will
never be freed nor detected by kmemleak as it's linked to the global
inflight list.  That's why we couldn't even notice the issue.

Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f7f201cc2668a8fd169@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7f7f201cc2668a8fd169
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
v2: Use skb_unref() instead of kfree_skb()
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240405204145.93169-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 5b41e2321209..d032eb5fa6df 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2665,7 +2665,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
 				}
 			} else if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
 				skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
-				consume_skb(skb);
+				WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
+				if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_unref(skb)))
+					kfree_skb(skb);
 				skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-05 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05 22:10 Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-04-06  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 net] af_unix: Clear stale u->oob_skb Eric Dumazet
2024-04-09  3:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
     [not found] <ae5def68-6cc0-4cfe-a031-fefb103e854c@oracle.com>
2024-04-05 23:01 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-04-05 23:28   ` Rao Shoaib

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240405221057.2406-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
    --cc=syzbot+7f7f201cc2668a8fd169@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).