netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	<linux-afs@lists.infradead.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rxrpc: Fix using alignmask being zero for __page_frag_alloc_align()
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:16:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240428111640.27306-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> (raw)

rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf() may be called with data_align being
zero in none_alloc_txbuf() and rxkad_alloc_txbuf(), data_align
is supposed to be an order-based alignment value, but zero is
not a valid order-based alignment value, and '~(data_align - 1)'
doesn't result in a valid mask-based alignment value for
__page_frag_alloc_align().

Fix it by passing a valid order-based alignment value in
none_alloc_txbuf() and rxkad_alloc_txbuf().

Also use page_frag_alloc_align() expecting an order-based
alignment value in rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf() to avoid doing the
alignment converting operation and to catch possible invalid
alignment value in the future. Remove the 'if (data_align)'
checking too, as it is always true for a valid order-based
alignment value.

Fixes: 6b2536462fd4 ("rxrpc: Fix use of changed alignment param to page_frag_alloc_align()")
Fixes: 49489bb03a50 ("rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page frags")
CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
V2: use 'umax' and drop 'U' as suggested by David.
---
 net/rxrpc/insecure.c |  2 +-
 net/rxrpc/rxkad.c    |  2 +-
 net/rxrpc/txbuf.c    | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
index f2701068ed9e..6716c021a532 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static int none_init_connection_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
  */
 static struct rxrpc_txbuf *none_alloc_txbuf(struct rxrpc_call *call, size_t remain, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	return rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(call, min_t(size_t, remain, RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN), 0, gfp);
+	return rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(call, min_t(size_t, remain, RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN), 1, gfp);
 }
 
 static int none_secure_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
index f1a68270862d..48a1475e6b06 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static struct rxrpc_txbuf *rxkad_alloc_txbuf(struct rxrpc_call *call, size_t rem
 	switch (call->conn->security_level) {
 	default:
 		space = min_t(size_t, remain, RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN);
-		return rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(call, space, 0, gfp);
+		return rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(call, space, 1, gfp);
 	case RXRPC_SECURITY_AUTH:
 		shdr = sizeof(struct rxkad_level1_hdr);
 		break;
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
index e0679658d9de..c3913d8a50d3 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/txbuf.c
@@ -21,20 +21,20 @@ struct rxrpc_txbuf *rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(struct rxrpc_call *call, size_t data_
 {
 	struct rxrpc_wire_header *whdr;
 	struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb;
-	size_t total, hoff = 0;
+	size_t total, hoff;
 	void *buf;
 
 	txb = kmalloc(sizeof(*txb), gfp);
 	if (!txb)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (data_align)
-		hoff = round_up(sizeof(*whdr), data_align) - sizeof(*whdr);
+	hoff = round_up(sizeof(*whdr), data_align) - sizeof(*whdr);
 	total = hoff + sizeof(*whdr) + data_size;
 
+	data_align = umax(data_align, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
 	mutex_lock(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc_lock);
-	buf = __page_frag_alloc_align(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc, total, gfp,
-				      ~(data_align - 1) & ~(L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1));
+	buf = page_frag_alloc_align(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc, total, gfp,
+				    data_align);
 	mutex_unlock(&call->conn->tx_data_alloc_lock);
 	if (!buf) {
 		kfree(txb);
-- 
2.33.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-28 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-28 11:16 Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2024-04-30 13:19 ` [PATCH v2] rxrpc: Fix using alignmask being zero for __page_frag_alloc_align() Paolo Abeni
2024-04-30 13:54 ` David Howells
2024-05-01  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240428111640.27306-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).