From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/bpf: Tests for SOCKMAP holding listening sockets
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:06:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e1a712c16d1_76782ace374ba5c02b@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110105027.257877-12-jakub@cloudflare.com>
Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> Now that SOCKMAP can store listening sockets, user-space and BPF API is
> open to a new set of potential pitfalls. Exercise the map operations (with
> extra attention to code paths susceptible to races between map ops and
> socket cloning), and BPF helpers that work with SOCKMAP to gain confidence
> that all works as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> ---
[...]
> +static void test_sockmap_insert_listening(int family, int sotype, int mapfd)
> +{
> + u64 value;
> + u32 key;
> + int s;
> +
> + s = listen_loopback(family, sotype);
> + if (s < 0)
> + return;
Will the test be marked OK if listen fails here? Should we mark it skipped or
maybe even failed? Just concerned it may be passing even if the update doesn't
actually happen.
> +
> + key = 0;
> + value = s;
> + xbpf_map_update_elem(mapfd, &key, &value, BPF_NOEXIST);
> + xclose(s);
> +}
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-12 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 10:50 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] Extend SOCKMAP to store listening sockets Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf, sk_msg: Don't reset saved sock proto on restore Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 22:50 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] net, sk_msg: Annotate lockless access to sk_prot on clone Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 23:14 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 15:09 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-14 3:14 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-20 17:00 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-20 18:11 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-21 12:42 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] net, sk_msg: Clear sk_user_data pointer on clone if tagged Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 23:38 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-12 12:55 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-13 20:15 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-14 16:04 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] tcp_bpf: Don't let child socket inherit parent protocol ops on copy Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 2:42 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-11 3:02 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-11 23:48 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 22:31 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-13 22:23 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-13 22:42 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-13 23:23 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf, sockmap: Allow inserting listening TCP sockets into sockmap Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 23:59 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 15:48 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf, sockmap: Don't set up sockmap progs for listening sockets Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-12 0:51 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-12 1:07 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 17:59 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] bpf, sockmap: Return socket cookie on lookup from syscall Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-12 0:56 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 23:12 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-14 3:16 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-14 15:48 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] bpf, sockmap: Let all kernel-land lookup values in SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] bpf: Allow selecting reuseport socket from a SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-12 1:00 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-13 23:45 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-15 12:41 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-13 23:51 ` Martin Lau
2020-01-15 12:57 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] selftests/bpf: Extend SK_REUSEPORT tests to cover SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-12 1:01 ` John Fastabend
2020-01-10 10:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/bpf: Tests for SOCKMAP holding listening sockets Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-12 1:06 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2020-01-13 15:58 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11 0:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] Extend SOCKMAP to store " Alexei Starovoitov
2020-01-11 22:47 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e1a712c16d1_76782ace374ba5c02b@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).