Hi,

here directly after reboot and a first iperf test

C:\Users\Simon\Downloads\iperf-2.0.9-win64>iperf.exe -c 10.10.11.1 -i1 -d
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  208 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.10.11.1, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  208 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  4] local 10.10.11.100 port 56062 connected with 10.10.11.1 port 5001
[  5] local 10.10.11.100 port 5001 connected with 10.10.11.1 port 42552
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0- 1.0 sec  16.2 MBytes   136 Mbits/sec
[  5]  0.0- 1.0 sec  70.5 MBytes   591 Mbits/sec
[  4]  1.0- 2.0 sec  14.4 MBytes   121 Mbits/sec
[  5]  1.0- 2.0 sec  63.9 MBytes   536 Mbits/sec
[  4]  2.0- 3.0 sec  13.4 MBytes   112 Mbits/sec
[  5]  2.0- 3.0 sec  67.6 MBytes   567 Mbits/sec
[  5]  3.0- 4.0 sec  68.6 MBytes   575 Mbits/sec
[  4]  3.0- 4.0 sec  15.9 MBytes   133 Mbits/sec
[  4]  4.0- 5.0 sec  13.9 MBytes   116 Mbits/sec
[  5]  4.0- 5.0 sec  65.2 MBytes   547 Mbits/sec
[  4]  5.0- 6.0 sec  16.8 MBytes   141 Mbits/sec
[  5]  5.0- 6.0 sec  67.1 MBytes   562 Mbits/sec
[  4]  6.0- 7.0 sec  17.2 MBytes   145 Mbits/sec
[  5]  6.0- 7.0 sec  65.7 MBytes   552 Mbits/sec
[  4]  7.0- 8.0 sec  16.0 MBytes   134 Mbits/sec
[  5]  7.0- 8.0 sec  67.0 MBytes   562 Mbits/sec
[  4]  8.0- 9.0 sec  15.6 MBytes   131 Mbits/sec
[  5]  8.0- 9.0 sec  66.5 MBytes   558 Mbits/sec
[  4]  9.0-10.0 sec  13.2 MBytes   111 Mbits/sec
[  4]  0.0-10.0 sec   153 MBytes   128 Mbits/sec
[  5]  9.0-10.0 sec  67.6 MBytes   567 Mbits/sec
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec   670 MBytes   562 Mbits/sec




regards,
Simon


Am 18.02.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Jose Abreu:
> On 2/18/2019 4:40 PM, Simon Huelck wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> EEE is enabled for odroid - c2 and should be working in 5.0-rc7 afaik ?
> Oops, I was seeing in the wrong version, sorry.
>
> And did you test without that patch ?
>
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu