From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
"dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:33:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e6de69c-c979-1f22-067d-24342cfbff52@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29c4d7854faaea6db33136a448a8d2f53d0cfd72.camel@kernel.org>
On 11/18/20 10:57 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>
> We are not slicing up any queues, from our HW and FW perspective SF ==
> VF literally, a full blown HW slice (Function), with isolated control
> and data plane of its own, this is very different from VMDq and more
> generic and secure. an SF device is exactly like a VF, doesn't steal or
> share any HW resources or control/data path with others. SF is
> basically SRIOV done right.
What does that mean with respect to mac filtering and ntuple rules?
Also, Tx is fairly easy to imagine, but how does hardware know how to
direct packets for the Rx path? As an example, consider 2 VMs or
containers with the same destination ip both using subfunction devices.
How does the nic know how to direct the ingress flows to the right
queues for the subfunction?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 19:24 [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 01/13] devlink: Prepare code to fill multiple port function attributes Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] devlink: Introduce PCI SF port flavour and port attribute Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] devlink: Support add and delete devlink port Parav Pandit
2020-11-18 16:21 ` David Ahern
2020-11-18 17:02 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-18 18:03 ` David Ahern
2020-11-18 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-18 19:36 ` David Ahern
2020-11-18 20:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-18 19:22 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-19 0:41 ` Jacob Keller
2020-11-19 1:17 ` David Ahern
2020-11-19 1:56 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2020-11-19 0:52 ` Jacob Keller
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] devlink: Support get and set state of port function Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] devlink: Avoid global devlink mutex, use per instance reload lock Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] devlink: Introduce devlink refcount to reduce scope of global devlink_mutex Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] net/mlx5: SF, Add auxiliary device support Parav Pandit
2020-12-07 2:48 ` David Ahern
2020-12-07 4:53 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] net/mlx5: SF, Add auxiliary device driver Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] net/mlx5: E-switch, Prepare eswitch to handle SF vport Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] net/mlx5: E-switch, Add eswitch helpers for " Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] net/mlx5: SF, Add SF configuration hardware commands Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] net/mlx5: SF, Add port add delete functionality Parav Pandit
2020-11-12 19:24 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] net/mlx5: SF, Port function state change support Parav Pandit
2020-11-16 22:52 ` [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-17 0:06 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-17 1:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-17 4:08 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-17 17:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-17 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-19 2:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-19 4:35 ` David Ahern
2020-11-19 5:57 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-20 1:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-25 5:33 ` David Ahern [this message]
2020-11-25 6:00 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-25 14:37 ` David Ahern
2020-11-20 1:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-20 17:58 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-11-20 19:04 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2020-11-23 21:51 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-24 7:01 ` Jason Wang
2020-11-24 7:05 ` Jason Wang
2020-11-19 6:12 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-19 8:25 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-20 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-20 3:34 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-17 18:50 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-19 2:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-19 6:22 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-19 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-20 3:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-20 3:50 ` Parav Pandit
2020-11-20 16:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e6de69c-c979-1f22-067d-24342cfbff52@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).