netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: not allow to set rto_min with a value below 200 msecs
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:34:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bVvSsQm0hywC-_UqnJKhBeQryZZBjYaiWszvQGURS=vA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_fbKbH2wm6Xurr+ELVag-LvyQdL+peJd=wp7OL7_zMZTQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:03:46PM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <
>>> marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > - patch2 - fix rtx attack vector
>>> >    - Add the floor value to rto_min to HZ/20 (which fits the values
>>> >      that Michael shared on the other email)
>>>
>>> I would encourage allowing minimum RTO values down to 5ms, if the ACK
>>> policy in the receiver makes this feasible. Our experience is that in
>>> datacenter environments it can be advantageous to allow timer-based loss
>>> recoveries using timeout values as low as 5ms, e.g.:
>>
>> Thanks Neal. On Xin's tests, the hearbeat timer becomes an issue at
>> ~25ms already. Xin, can you share more details on the hw, which CPU
>> was used?

Hi,

Did we reach any decision on this? This continues to produce bug
reports on syzbot.

I am not sure whom you are asking, because Xin is you unless I am
missing something :)
But if you mean syzbot hardware, then it's GCE VMs with modern Intel
CPUs but an important aspect is a heavy-debug config (which you can
take from here https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3dcd59a1f907245f891f)
and systematic bug reporting. So if it's any flaky in your testing, it
will produce dozens of bug emails on syzbot.


> It was on a KVM guest,  "-smp 2,cores=1,threads=1,sockets=2"
> # lscpu
> Architecture:          x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:            Little Endian
> CPU(s):                2
> On-line CPU(s) list:   0,1
> Thread(s) per core:    1
> Core(s) per socket:    1
> Socket(s):             2
> NUMA node(s):          1
> Vendor ID:             GenuineIntel
> CPU family:            6
> Model:                 13
> Model name:            QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.3
> Stepping:              3
> CPU MHz:               2397.222
> BogoMIPS:              4794.44
> Hypervisor vendor:     KVM
> Virtualization type:   full
> L1d cache:             32K
> L1i cache:             32K
> L2 cache:              4096K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0,1
> Flags:                 fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
> pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good
> nopl cpuid pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm abm pti
>
> If we're counting on max_t to fix this CPU stuck. It should not that
> matter if min rto < the value causing that stuck.
>
>>
>> Anyway, what about we add a floor to rto_max too, so that RTO can
>> actually grow into something bigger that don't hog the CPU? Like:
>> rto_min floor = 5ms
>> rto_max floor = 50ms
>>
>>   Marcelo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-25 17:41 [PATCH net] sctp: not allow to set rto_min with a value below 200 msecs Xin Long
2018-05-25 19:13 ` Neil Horman
2018-05-26 15:42   ` Michael Tuexen
2018-05-26 15:50     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-27  1:01       ` Neil Horman
2018-05-28 19:43         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-05-29 11:41           ` Neil Horman
2018-05-29 13:06             ` Michael Tuexen
2018-05-29 15:45               ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-05-29 16:03                 ` Neal Cardwell
2018-05-29 17:06                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-05-29 17:45                     ` Xin Long
2018-05-29 18:02                       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-06-04  8:34                       ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2018-06-04 12:15                         ` Xin Long
2018-05-27  8:58       ` Michael Tuexen
2018-05-28 18:56         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACT4Y+bVvSsQm0hywC-_UqnJKhBeQryZZBjYaiWszvQGURS=vA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).