From: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
Jesse Hathaway <jesse@mbuki-mvuki.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Race condition in route lookup
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:42:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_A_zB0uLn34UeCpXOSQZiOsPFfcfvDtmNZWrks6PCj0=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d4dd279-b20a-e333-2dd6-fe2901e67bce@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:45 AM David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/14/19 1:26 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> >
> > AFAICT, even for the route that are affected by fib6_update_sernum_upto_root(),
> > I don't see the RTF_PCPU route is re-created. v6 sk does
> > dst_check() => re-lookup the fib6 =>
> > found the same RTF_PCPU (but does not re-create it) =>
> > update the sk with new cookie in ip6_dst_store()
> >
Hmm... That is a good point. Why does v4 need to recreate the dst
cache even though the route itself is not changed?
Now that I think about it, I agree with Martin's previous comment: it
probably is because v4 code does not cache rt->rt_genid into the
socket and every user of the rt is sharing the same rt_genid stored in
the route itself.
>
> That's fine. The pcpu cache is per nexthop (fib6_nh) for a specific
> gateway/device.
>
> The invalidate forces another lookup for the intended destination after
> the change to the fib. If the lookup resolves to the same fib entry and
> nexthop, then re-using the same cached dst/rt6_info is ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 16:00 Race condition in route lookup Jesse Hathaway
2019-10-10 8:31 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-10 8:46 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-11 14:36 ` Jesse Hathaway
2019-10-11 15:42 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-11 16:09 ` Jesse Hathaway
2019-10-11 17:54 ` Wei Wang
2019-10-11 18:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-11 18:25 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-11 18:47 ` Wei Wang
2019-10-11 18:52 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-11 21:01 ` Jesse Hathaway
2019-10-11 21:27 ` David Ahern
2019-10-12 6:56 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-14 0:23 ` Wei Wang
2019-10-14 17:26 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-15 14:45 ` David Ahern
2019-10-15 16:42 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2019-10-16 6:35 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-15 14:29 ` Jesse Hathaway
2019-10-15 16:44 ` Wei Wang
2019-10-16 6:39 ` Martin Lau
2019-10-16 16:35 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEA6p_A_zB0uLn34UeCpXOSQZiOsPFfcfvDtmNZWrks6PCj0=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=jesse@mbuki-mvuki.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).