netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add kfree_skb raw_tp test
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 22:36:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZS3kvunYnPu6x674H08DZKnuc37c9+m4p_2EjdNuDGSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191005050314.1114330-11-ast@kernel.org>

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:04 PM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Load basic cls_bpf program.
> Load raw_tracepoint program and attach to kfree_skb raw tracepoint.
> Trigger cls_bpf via prog_test_run.
> At the end of test_run kernel will call kfree_skb
> which will trigger trace_kfree_skb tracepoint.
> Which will call our raw_tracepoint program.
> Which will take that skb and will dump it into perf ring buffer.
> Check that user space received correct packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> ---

LGTM, few minor nits below.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>


>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c      | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfree_skb.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfree_skb.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..238bc7024b36
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +
> +static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
> +{
> +       int ifindex = *(int *)data, duration = 0;
> +       struct ipv6_packet * pkt_v6 = data + 4;
> +
> +       if (ifindex != 1)
> +               /* spurious kfree_skb not on loopback device */
> +               return;
> +       if (CHECK(size != 76, "check_size", "size %d != 76\n", size))

compiler doesn't complain about %d and size being unsigned?

> +               return;
> +       if (CHECK(pkt_v6->eth.h_proto != 0xdd86, "check_eth",
> +                 "h_proto %x\n", pkt_v6->eth.h_proto))
> +               return;
> +       if (CHECK(pkt_v6->iph.nexthdr != 6, "check_ip",
> +                 "iph.nexthdr %x\n", pkt_v6->iph.nexthdr))
> +               return;
> +       if (CHECK(pkt_v6->tcp.doff != 5, "check_tcp",
> +                 "tcp.doff %x\n", pkt_v6->tcp.doff))
> +               return;
> +
> +       *(bool *)ctx = true;
> +}
> +
> +void test_kfree_skb(void)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_prog_load_attr attr = {
> +               .file = "./kfree_skb.o",
> +               .log_level = 2,
> +       };
> +
> +       struct bpf_object *obj, *obj2 = NULL;
> +       struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
> +       struct perf_buffer *pb = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_map *perf_buf_map;
> +       struct bpf_program *prog;
> +       __u32 duration, retval;
> +       int err, pkt_fd, kfree_skb_fd;
> +       bool passed = false;
> +
> +       err = bpf_prog_load("./test_pkt_access.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj, &pkt_fd);
> +       if (CHECK(err, "prog_load sched cls", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
> +               return;
> +
> +       err = bpf_prog_load_xattr(&attr, &obj2, &kfree_skb_fd);
> +       if (CHECK(err, "prog_load raw tp", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +
> +       prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj2, "raw_tracepoint/kfree_skb");
> +       if (CHECK(!prog, "find_prog", "prog kfree_skb not found\n"))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +       link = bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, "kfree_skb");
> +       if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_raw_tp", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +
> +       perf_buf_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj2, "perf_buf_map");
> +       if (CHECK(!perf_buf_map, "find_perf_buf_map", "not found\n"))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +
> +       /* set up perf buffer */
> +       pb_opts.sample_cb = on_sample;
> +       pb_opts.ctx = &passed;
> +       pb = perf_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(perf_buf_map), 1, &pb_opts);
> +       if (CHECK(IS_ERR(pb), "perf_buf__new", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(pb)))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +
> +       err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v6, sizeof(pkt_v6),
> +                               NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
> +       CHECK(err || retval, "ipv6",
> +             "err %d errno %d retval %d duration %d\n",
> +             err, errno, retval, duration);
> +
> +       /* read perf buffer */
> +       err = perf_buffer__poll(pb, 100);
> +       if (CHECK(err < 0, "perf_buffer__poll", "err %d\n", err))
> +               goto close_prog;
> +       /* make sure kfree_skb program was triggered
> +        * and it sent expected skb into ring buffer
> +        */
> +       CHECK_FAIL(!passed);
> +close_prog:
> +       perf_buffer__free(pb);
> +       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(link))
> +               bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +       bpf_object__close(obj);
> +       bpf_object__close(obj2);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfree_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfree_skb.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..61f1abfc4f48
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfree_skb.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY);
> +       __uint(key_size, sizeof(int));
> +       __uint(value_size, sizeof(int));
> +} perf_buf_map SEC(".maps");
> +
> +#define _(P) (__builtin_preserve_access_index(P))
> +
> +/* define few struct-s that bpf program needs to access */
> +struct callback_head {
> +       struct callback_head *next;
> +       void (*func)(struct callback_head *head);
> +};
> +struct dev_ifalias {
> +       struct callback_head rcuhead;
> +};
> +
> +struct net_device /* same as kernel's struct net_device */ {
> +       int ifindex;
> +       volatile struct dev_ifalias *ifalias;
> +};
> +
> +struct sk_buff {
> +       /* field names and sizes should match to those in the kernel */
> +        unsigned int            len,
> +                                data_len;
> +        __u16                   mac_len,
> +                                hdr_len;
> +        __u16                   queue_mapping;
> +       struct net_device *dev;
> +       /* order of the fields doesn't matter */
> +};
> +
> +/* copy arguments from
> + * include/trace/events/skb.h:
> + * TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
> + *         TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb, void *location),
> + *
> + * into struct below:
> + */
> +struct trace_kfree_skb {
> +       struct sk_buff *skb;
> +       void *location;
> +};
> +
> +SEC("raw_tracepoint/kfree_skb")
> +int trace_kfree_skb(struct trace_kfree_skb* ctx)
> +{
> +       struct sk_buff *skb = ctx->skb;
> +       struct net_device *dev;
> +       int ifindex;
> +       struct callback_head *ptr;
> +       void *func;

nit: style checker should have complained about missing empty line

> +       __builtin_preserve_access_index(({
> +               dev = skb->dev;
> +               ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> +               ptr = dev->ifalias->rcuhead.next;
> +               func = ptr->func;
> +       }));
> +
> +       bpf_printk("rcuhead.next %llx func %llx\n", ptr, func);
> +       bpf_printk("skb->len %d\n", _(skb->len));
> +       bpf_printk("skb->queue_mapping %d\n", _(skb->queue_mapping));
> +       bpf_printk("dev->ifindex %d\n", ifindex);
> +
> +       /* send first 72 byte of the packet to user space */
> +       bpf_skb_output(skb, &perf_buf_map, (72ull << 32) | BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU,
> +                      &ifindex, sizeof(ifindex));
> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.20.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-05  5:03 [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] bpf: revolutionize bpf tracing Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/10] bpf: add typecast to raw_tracepoints to help BTF generation Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05 18:40   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-06  3:58   ` John Fastabend
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: add typecast to bpf helpers " Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05 18:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-06  4:00   ` John Fastabend
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/10] bpf: process in-kernel BTF Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-06  6:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-06 23:49     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-07  0:20       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 20:51   ` Martin Lau
2019-10-10  3:43     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/10] libbpf: auto-detect btf_id of raw_tracepoint Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-07 23:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09  2:26     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-07 16:32   ` Alan Maguire
2019-10-09  3:59     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-08  0:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09  3:30     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-09  4:01       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09  5:10         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10  3:54           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] bpf: add support for BTF pointers to interpreter Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-08  3:08   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] bpf: add support for BTF pointers to x86 JIT Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  6:03   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-09 17:38   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 17:46     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/10] bpf: check types of arguments passed into helpers Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-09 18:01   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 19:58     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] bpf: disallow bpf_probe_read[_str] helpers Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-09  5:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 19:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-05  5:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add kfree_skb raw_tp test Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-09  5:36   ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2019-10-09 17:37     ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEf4BzZS3kvunYnPu6x674H08DZKnuc37c9+m4p_2EjdNuDGSg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).