netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	dsahern@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] mld: change context from atomic to sleepable
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:17:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMArcTXXsWoRqcsg0-zkDTwPbAonBCo1tBiKTr7_ZBF1Y5NxqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpU5Z_pZvwKSVBY6Ge8ADsTxsDh+2cvtoO+Oduqr9mXMQA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 10:50, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Hi Cong!
Thank you for your review.

> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:50 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patchset changes context of MLD module.
> > Before this patch, MLD functions are atomic context so it couldn't use
> > sleepable functions and flags.
> > This patchset also contains other refactoring patches, which is to use
> > list macro, etc.
> >
> > 1~3 and 5~7 are refactoring patches and 4 and 8 patches actually
> > change context, which is the actual goal of this patchset.
> > MLD module has used timer API. The timer expiration function is
> > processed as the atomic context so in order to change context,
> > it should be replaced.
> > So, The fourth patch is to switch from timer to delayed_work.
> > And the eighth patch is to use the mutex instead of spinlock and
> > rwlock because A critical section of spinlock and rwlock is atomic.
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> A quick question: are those cleanup or refactoring patches necessary
> for the main patch, that is patch 4? If not, please consider separating
> patch 4 and patch 8 out, as they fix a bug so they are different from
> the others.
>

You're right, this patchset contains many unnecessary changes.
So I will send a v2 patch, which contains only the necessary changes.
And target branch will be 'net', not 'net-next'.

Thanks a lot for the suggestions and review!
Taehee Yoo

> Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 17:50 [PATCH net-next 0/8] mld: change context from atomic to sleepable Taehee Yoo
2021-02-09  1:50 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-09  2:17   ` Taehee Yoo [this message]
2021-02-09  5:31     ` Cong Wang
2021-02-09  8:09       ` Taehee Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMArcTXXsWoRqcsg0-zkDTwPbAonBCo1tBiKTr7_ZBF1Y5NxqQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).