From: Gowen <gowen@potatocomputing.co.uk>
To: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: VRF Issue Since kernel 5
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 07:46:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CWLP265MB1554308A1373D9ECE68CB854FDB70@CWLP265MB1554.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
Hi there,
Dave A said this was the mailer to send this to:
I’ve been using my management interface in a VRF for several months now and it’s worked perfectly – I’ve been able to update/upgrade the packages just fine and iptables works excellently with it – exactly as I needed.
Since Kernel 5 though I am no longer able to update – but the issue is quite a curious one as some traffic appears to be fine (DNS lookups use VRF correctly) but others don’t (updating/upgrading the packages)
I have on this device 2 interfaces:
Eth0 for management – inbound SSH, DNS, updates/upgrades
Eth1 for managing other boxes (ansible using SSH)
Link and addr info shown below:
Admin@NETM06:~$ ip link show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master mgmt-vrf state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:22:48:07:cc:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:22:48:07:c9:6c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: mgmt-vrf: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 8a:f6:26:65:02:5a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Admin@NETM06:~$ ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master mgmt-vrf state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:22:48:07:cc:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.24.12.10/24 brd 10.24.12.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::222:48ff:fe07:ccad/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:22:48:07:c9:6c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.24.12.9/24 brd 10.24.12.255 scope global eth1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::222:48ff:fe07:c96c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: mgmt-vrf: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 8a:f6:26:65:02:5a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
the production traffic is all in the 10.0.0.0/8 network (eth1 global VRF) except for a few subnets (DNS) which are routed out eth0 (mgmt-vrf)
Admin@NETM06:~$ ip route show
default via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.0.0.0/8 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth1
10.24.12.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.24.12.9
10.24.65.0/24 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.25.65.0/24 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.26.0.0/21 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.26.64.0/21 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
Admin@NETM06:~$ ip route show vrf mgmt-vrf
default via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
unreachable default metric 4278198272
10.24.12.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.24.12.10
10.24.65.0/24 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.25.65.0/24 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.26.0.0/21 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
10.26.64.0/21 via 10.24.12.1 dev eth0
The strange activity occurs when I enter the command “sudo apt update” as I can resolve the DNS request (10.24.65.203 or 10.24.64.203, verified with tcpdump) out eth0 but for the actual update traffic there is no activity:
sudo tcpdump -i eth0 '(host 10.24.65.203 or host 10.25.65.203) and port 53' -n
<OUTPUT OMITTED FOR BREVITY>
10:06:05.268735 IP 10.24.12.10.39963 > 10.24.65.203.53: 48798+ [1au] A? security.ubuntu.com. (48)
<OUTPUT OMITTED FOR BREVITY>
10:06:05.284403 IP 10.24.65.203.53 > 10.24.12.10.39963: 48798 13/0/1 A 91.189.91.23, A 91.189.88.24, A 91.189.91.26, A 91.189.88.162, A 91.189.88.149, A 91.189.91.24, A 91.189.88.173, A 91.189.88.177, A 91.189.88.31, A 91.189.91.14, A 91.189.88.176, A 91.189.88.175, A 91.189.88.174 (256)
You can see that the update traffic is returned but is not accepted by the stack and a RST is sent
Admin@NETM06:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth0 '(not host 168.63.129.16 and port 80)' -n
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
10:17:12.690658 IP 10.24.12.10.40216 > 91.189.88.175.80: Flags [S], seq 2279624826, win 64240, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2029365856 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
10:17:12.691929 IP 10.24.12.10.52362 > 91.189.95.83.80: Flags [S], seq 1465797256, win 64240, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 3833463674 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
10:17:12.696270 IP 91.189.88.175.80 > 10.24.12.10.40216: Flags [S.], seq 968450722, ack 2279624827, win 28960, options [mss 1418,sackOK,TS val 81957103 ecr 2029365856,nop,wscale 7], length 0
10:17:12.696301 IP 10.24.12.10.40216 > 91.189.88.175.80: Flags [R], seq 2279624827, win 0, length 0
10:17:12.697884 IP 91.189.95.83.80 > 10.24.12.10.52362: Flags [S.], seq 4148330738, ack 1465797257, win 28960, options [mss 1418,sackOK,TS val 2257624414 ecr 3833463674,nop,wscale 8], length 0
10:17:12.697909 IP 10.24.12.10.52362 > 91.189.95.83.80: Flags [R], seq 1465797257, win 0, length 0
I can emulate the DNS lookup using netcat in the vrf:
sudo ip vrf exec mgmt-vrf nc -u 10.24.65.203 53
then interactively enter the binary for a www.google.co.uk request:
0035624be394010000010000000000010377777706676f6f676c6502636f02756b00000100010000290200000000000000
This returns as expected:
00624be394010000010000000000010377777706676f6f676c6502636f02756b00000100010000290200000000000000
I can run:
Admin@NETM06:~$ host www.google.co.uk
www.google.co.uk has address 172.217.169.3
www.google.co.uk has IPv6 address 2a00:1450:4009:80d::2003
but I get a timeout for:
sudo ip vrf exec mgmt-vrf host www.google.co.uk
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
However I can take a repo address and vrf exec to it on port 80:
Admin@NETM06:~$ sudo ip vrf exec mgmt-vrf nc 91.189.91.23 80
hello
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
<OUTPUT OMITTED>
My iptables rule:
sudo iptables -Z
Admin@NETM06:~$ sudo iptables -L -v
Chain INPUT (policy DROP 16 packets, 3592 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
44 2360 ACCEPT tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere tcp spt:http ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED
83 10243 ACCEPT udp -- any any anywhere anywhere udp spt:domain ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED
I cannot find out why the update isn’t working. Any help greatly appreciated
Kind Regards,
Gareth
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 7:46 Gowen [this message]
2019-09-09 9:28 ` VRF Issue Since kernel 5 Alexis Bauvin
[not found] ` <CWLP265MB1554B902B7F3B43E6E75FD0DFDB70@CWLP265MB1554.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2019-09-09 12:01 ` Alexis Bauvin
2019-09-09 19:43 ` Gowen
2019-09-10 14:22 ` Gowen
2019-09-10 16:36 ` David Ahern
2019-09-11 5:09 ` Gowen
2019-09-11 11:19 ` Gowen
2019-09-11 11:49 ` Gowen
2019-09-11 12:15 ` Mike Manning
[not found] ` <CWLP265MB155485682829AD9B66AB66FCFDB10@CWLP265MB1554.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
[not found] ` <CWLP265MB155424EF95E39E98C4502F86FDB10@CWLP265MB1554.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2019-09-11 16:09 ` David Ahern
2019-09-12 6:54 ` Gowen
2020-03-10 20:47 ` Maximilian Bosch
2020-03-12 1:06 ` David Ahern
2020-04-01 18:16 ` Maximilian Bosch
2020-04-01 19:18 ` David Ahern
2020-04-01 20:35 ` Maximilian Bosch
2020-04-01 20:41 ` David Ahern
2020-04-02 23:02 ` Maximilian Bosch
2020-04-05 16:52 ` David Ahern
2020-04-08 10:07 ` Mike Manning
2020-04-08 15:36 ` David Ahern
2020-04-19 20:35 ` Maximilian Bosch
2019-09-11 16:53 ` David Ahern
2019-09-10 16:39 ` David Ahern
2019-09-11 17:02 ` David Ahern
2019-09-12 6:50 ` Gowen
2019-09-13 17:41 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CWLP265MB1554308A1373D9ECE68CB854FDB70@CWLP265MB1554.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=gowen@potatocomputing.co.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).