netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:56:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1560534694.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw)

v2:

- Simplified the frame pointer fixes - instead of using R12, just
  continue to use RBP for BPF_REG_FP, but use nested frames so the
  unwinder can understand (suggested by David Laight).

- Dropped the AT&T syntax patches for now.  I'm about to disappear for a
  week and I don't have time to argue about whether code readability is
  a good thing.

- I can do the 32-bit version of the fix when I get back.  It should be
  easy enough.

v1 is here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1560431531.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com


Josh Poimboeuf (4):
  objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code
  x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function
  x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage
  x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code

Song Liu (1):
  perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel()

 arch/x86/events/core.c       |  10 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c |  26 ++++++--
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c  | 115 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 kernel/bpf/core.c            |   5 +-
 tools/objtool/check.c        |  16 ++++-
 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 17:56 Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel() Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:06     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:16       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-14 21:20         ` Song Liu
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:07     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:09       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:22           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:17             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 23:30               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  0:02                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:06                   ` abhja kaanlani
2019-06-15  0:07                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-17 14:57     ` David Laight
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:13         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 23:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:54             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:02               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  4:27                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  5:16                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15 12:57                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1560534694.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kasong@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).