netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] devlink: implement DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:30:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe618551-3108-958a-ca6d-69c2b6fd43a6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325164622.GZ11304@nanopsycho.orion>



On 3/25/2020 9:46 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:34:43PM CET, jacob.e.keller@intel.com wrote:
>> +
>> +	/* Check to make sure it's empty first */
>> +	if (xa_load(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id))
> 
> How this can happen? The entry was just allocated. WARN_ON.
> 

Sure, I'll add WARN_ON. I think the return should still be kept, since
it causes the caller to fail instead of accidentally overwriting the
snapshot count.

> 
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +	err = xa_err(xa_store(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id, xa_mk_value(0),
>> +			      GFP_KERNEL));
> 
> Just return and avoid err variable.
> 

Yep, done.


>> +
>> +	if (region->cur_snapshots == region->max_snapshots) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "The region has reached the maximum number of stored snapshots");
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Maybe ENOBUFS or ENOSPC? ENOMEM seems odd as it is related to memory
> allocation fails which this is not.
> 

Hmmm. This actually appears to be duplicated from the snapshot_create
function which used ENOMEM. Will add a patch to clean that up first.

It seems like we end up duplicating checks from within the
__devlink_region_snapshot_create merely because we have the extack
pointer here...

> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	snapshot_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_SNAPSHOT_ID]);
>> +
>> +	if (devlink_region_snapshot_get_by_id(region, snapshot_id)) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "The requested snapshot id is already in use");
>> +		return -EEXIST;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	err = __devlink_snapshot_id_insert(devlink, snapshot_id);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "The requested snapshot id is already in used");
> 
> Different message would be appropriate.
> 

Right. This is the "this shouldn't happen" case from above I think.

> 
>> +		return err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	err = region->ops->snapshot(devlink, info->extack, &data);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto err_decrement_snapshot_count;
>> +
>> +	err = __devlink_region_snapshot_create(region, data, snapshot_id);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto err_free_snapshot_data;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_decrement_snapshot_count:
>> +	__devlink_snapshot_id_decrement(devlink, snapshot_id);
>> +err_free_snapshot_data:
> 
> In devlink the error labers are named according to actions that failed.
> Please align.
> 

Sure.

Thanks,
Jake

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 22:34 [PATCH 00/10] implement DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] devlink: prepare to support region operations Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] devlink: convert snapshot destructor callback to region op Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] devlink: trivial: fix tab in function documentation Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] devlink: add function to take snapshot while locked Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 17:56   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] devlink: extract snapshot id allocation to helper function Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 14:08   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] devlink: convert snapshot id getter to return an error Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 18:04   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-25 19:13     ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-26  1:33     ` Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH] devlink: track snapshot id usage count using an xarray Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 16:08   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-26  1:16     ` Jacob Keller
2020-03-26  1:43     ` Jacob Keller
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] devlink: implement DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 16:46   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-25 17:18     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-25 17:20       ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-25 17:46         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-25 18:41           ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-26  1:30     ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] netdevsim: support taking immediate snapshot via devlink Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 16:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-24 22:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] ice: add a devlink region for dumping NVM contents Jacob Keller
2020-03-25 17:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-25 13:49 ` [PATCH 00/10] implement DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW Jiri Pirko
2020-03-25 13:50 ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe618551-3108-958a-ca6d-69c2b6fd43a6@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).