netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryoga Saito <proelbtn@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>,
	davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>,
	Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add netfilter hooks to track SRv6-encapsulated flows
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:12:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0B18A029-E4B5-4D74-AE9E-C617E5325190@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715221342.GA19921@salvia>

Hi Pablo

I would like your comments for it.

I have 2 implementation ideas about fixing this patch:

1.) fix only coding style pointed out in previous mail
2.) add sysctl parameter and change NF_HOOK to NF_HOOK_COND for user to
    select behavior of hook call

I believed SRv6 encaps/decaps operations should be tracked with conntrack
like any other virtual net-device based tunneling protocols (e.g. VXLAN,
IPIP), even if the forwarding performance slows down because occurred by
lack of considerations. and any other tunnels also have this overhead.

Therefore, I support 1st idea. However, 2nd idea is ok if the overhead
caused by adding new hook isn't acceptable.

Ryoga

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-06  5:25 [PATCH] net: Add netfilter hooks to track SRv6-encapsulated flows Ryoga Saito
2021-07-08  1:31 ` Andrea Mayer
2021-07-08 13:38   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-08 16:32     ` Andrea Mayer
     [not found]       ` <CALPAGbJt_rb_r3M2AEJ_6VRsG+zXrEOza0U-6SxFGsERGipT4w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-08 20:52         ` Ryoga Saito
2021-07-09 18:48           ` Andrea Mayer
2021-07-11  7:12             ` Ryoga Saito
2021-07-12 23:31               ` Andrea Mayer
2021-07-15 22:13                 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-19 10:12                   ` Ryoga Saito [this message]
2021-07-26 21:29                     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-07-19 11:55                   ` Andrea Mayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0B18A029-E4B5-4D74-AE9E-C617E5325190@gmail.com \
    --to=proelbtn@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paolo.lungaroni@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).