On 2019-12-05, at 11:49:59 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> wrote:
> > Pablo, comparing the x_tables and nftables connmark implementations
> > I see that nftables doesn't support all the bit-twiddling that
> > x_tables does.  Why is this?  Was it not wanted or has it just not
> > been imple- mented?
>
> The latter.  It would be needed to extend nft_bitwise.c to accept a
> second register value and extend nft userspace to accept non-immediate
> values as second operand.

Thanks for the explanation.

J.