From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] selftest: netfilter: additional cleanups
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240425121258.619c61de@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240423130604.7013-1-fw@strlen.de>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:05:43 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> I intend to route future changes, if any, via nf(-next) trees
> now that the 'massive code churn' phase is over.
I hooked the tests which reliably pass up to patchwork now.
(The PW reporting is "combined" so basically the daemon will take
them into account for the "contest" check).
On the debug kernels we have a bunch of tests failing due to timeout.
We multiply the timeout set in ksft settings by 2 for the debug kernel,
so in netfilter we give them 1000 sec, but looks like that's not enough.
Would you be willing to bump it up? I can override it in the config of
the runner, as last resort.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 13:05 [PATCH net-next 0/7] selftest: netfilter: additional cleanups Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] selftests: netfilter: nft_concat_range.sh: move to lib.sh infra Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] selftests: netfilter: nft_concat_range.sh: drop netcat support Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] selftests: netfilter: nft_concat_range.sh: shellcheck cleanups Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] selftests: netfilter: nft_flowtable.sh: re-run with random mtu sizes Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] selftests: netfilter: nft_flowtable.sh: shellcheck cleanups Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] selftests: netfilter: skip tests on early errors Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 13:05 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] selftests: netfilter: conntrack_vrf.sh: prefer socat, not iperf3 Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 16:50 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] selftest: netfilter: additional cleanups Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-23 19:42 ` Florian Westphal
2024-04-23 20:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-30 13:44 ` Florian Westphal
2024-04-25 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-04-25 19:12 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240425121258.619c61de@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).