From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, heiko@sntech.de, emma@anholt.net,
airlied@linux.ie, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
melissa.srw@gmail.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
mihail.atanassov@arm.com, festevam@gmail.com,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jy0922.shim@samsung.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wens@csie.org,
jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, xinliang.liu@linaro.org,
kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com, james.qian.wang@arm.com,
linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, bskeggs@redhat.com,
chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
puck.chen@hisilicon.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
inki.dae@samsung.com, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, mripard@kernel.org,
laurentiu.palcu@oss.nxp.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
hyun.kwon@xilinx.com, tomba@kernel.org, jyri.sarha@iki.fi,
yannick.fertre@foss.st.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
sw0312.kim@samsung.com, hjc@rock-chips.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
philippe.cornu@foss.st.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, tiantao6@hisilicon.com,
shawnguo@kernel.org, brian.starkey@arm.com, zackr@vmware.com,
l.stach@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 04/27] drm: Don't test for IRQ support in VBLANK ioctls
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:27:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624102732.3h7lnsik7mkbphgw@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af21db75-584f-aec0-9659-d5386f27b4ea@suse.de>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:07:57AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 24.06.21 um 10:51 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 24.06.21 um 10:06 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > > > index 3417e1ac7918..10fe16bafcb6 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> > > > > @@ -1748,8 +1748,16 @@ int drm_wait_vblank_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > > > unsigned int pipe_index;
> > > > > unsigned int flags, pipe, high_pipe;
> > > > > - if (!dev->irq_enabled)
> > > > > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY)
> > > > > + if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) {
> > > > > + if (!dev->irq_enabled)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > + } else /* if DRIVER_MODESET */
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > + {
> > > > > + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev))
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > Sheesh I hate this kind of inline #ifdefs.
> > > >
> > > > Two alternate suggestions that I believe should be as just efficient:
> > >
> > > Or how about:
> > >
> > > static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY)
> > > if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)))
> > >
> > > return dev->irq_enabled;
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev);
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > It's inline, but still readable.
> >
> > It's definitely better than the original, but it's unclear to me why
> > you'd prefer this over option 2) below. I guess the only reason I can
> > think of is emphasizing the conditional compilation. However,
> > IS_ENABLED() is widely used in this manner specifically to avoid inline
> > #if, and the compiler optimizes it away.
>
> It's simply more readable to me as the condition is simpler. But option 2 is
> also ok.
Either option looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Thanks for doing that!
Liviu
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Jani.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 1) The more verbose:
> > > >
> > > > #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY)
> > > > static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)))
> > > > return dev->irq_enabled;
> > > > else
> > > > return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev);
> > > > }
> > > > #else
> > > > static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev);
> > > > }
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > 2) The more compact:
> > > >
> > > > static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY) && unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY)))
> > > > return dev->irq_enabled;
> > > > else
> > > > return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Then, in drm_wait_vblank_ioctl().
> > > >
> > > > if (!drm_wait_vblank_supported(dev))
> > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > >
> > > > The compiler should do the right thing without any explicit inline
> > > > keywords etc.
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > > Jani.
> > > >
> > > > > if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL)
> > > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > > @@ -2023,7 +2031,7 @@ int drm_crtc_get_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > > > if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > - if (!dev->irq_enabled)
> > > > > + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev))
> > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > crtc = drm_crtc_find(dev, file_priv, get_seq->crtc_id);
> > > > > @@ -2082,7 +2090,7 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > > > if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
> > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > - if (!dev->irq_enabled)
> > > > > + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev))
> > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > crtc = drm_crtc_find(dev, file_priv, queue_seq->crtc_id);
> > > >
> >
>
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-27 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 7:28 [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 00/27] Deprecate struct drm_device.irq_enabled Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 01/27] drm/amdgpu: Track IRQ state in local device state Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 02/27] drm/hibmc: Call drm_irq_uninstall() unconditionally Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 03/27] drm/radeon: Track IRQ state in local device state Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 04/27] drm: Don't test for IRQ support in VBLANK ioctls Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 8:06 ` Jani Nikula
2021-06-24 8:19 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 8:28 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 8:51 ` Jani Nikula
2021-06-24 9:07 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 10:27 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2021-06-24 12:03 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-24 12:36 ` Jani Nikula
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 05/27] drm/armada: Don't set struct drm_device.irq_enabled Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 06/27] drm/i915: Track IRQ state in local device state Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 8:08 ` Jani Nikula
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 07/27] drm/komeda: Don't set struct drm_device.irq_enabled Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 08/27] drm/malidp: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 09/27] drm/exynos: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:28 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 10/27] drm/kirin: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 11/27] drm/imx: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 8:25 ` Philipp Zabel
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 12/27] drm/imx/dcss: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 13/27] drm/mediatek: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 14/27] drm/nouveau: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 15/27] drm/omapdrm: Track IRQ state in local device state Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 16/27] drm/rcar-du: Don't set struct drm_device.irq_enabled Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 10:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 17/27] drm/rockchip: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 18/27] drm/sti: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 19/27] drm/stm: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 20/27] drm/sun4i: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 21/27] drm/tegra: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 12:04 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 22/27] drm/tidss: Don't use " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 23/27] drm/vc4: Don't set " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 24/27] drm/vkms: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 10:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 25/27] drm/vmwgfx: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 26/27] drm/xlnx: " Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:29 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 27/27] drm/zte: " Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210624102732.3h7lnsik7mkbphgw@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=brian.starkey@arm.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emma@anholt.net \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hamohammed.sa@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
--cc=hyun.kwon@xilinx.com \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.qian.wang@arm.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=jyri.sarha@iki.fi \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurentiu.palcu@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=melissa.srw@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=mihail.atanassov@arm.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=philippe.cornu@foss.st.com \
--cc=puck.chen@hisilicon.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
--cc=tomba@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=xinliang.liu@linaro.org \
--cc=yannick.fertre@foss.st.com \
--cc=zackr@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).