From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com" <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ndctl: Use max_available_extent for creating namespaces
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:34:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530030875.27147.24.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hzER7RpeHnsEAJdsnb8CzruZdoK2m3hKVeAsJXkC_ryg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:32 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 10:29 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:19:28AM -0700, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:37 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > > The available_size attribute returns all the unused regions, but
> > > > > a
> > > > > namespace has to use contiguous free regions. This patch uses the
> > > > > attribute returning the largest capacity that can be created for
> > > > > determining if the namespace can be created.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > ndctl/lib/libndctl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym | 1 +
> > > > > ndctl/libndctl.h | 2 ++
> > > > > ndctl/namespace.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Hi Keith,
> > > >
> > > > The patch looks good, but just a couple of 'meta' comments.
> > > > 1. We typically send ndctl patches separately from kernel patches
> > > > (i.e.
> > > > not
> > > > thraded together).
> > > > 2. for ndctl patches, an 'ndctl PATCH' prefix is recommended. You
> > > > can
> > > > set a
> > > > repo local config parameter for doing this automatically on git
> > > > format-
> > > > patch.
> > > > git config format.subjectprefix "ndctl PATCH"
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking the kernel changes will be queued for 4.19, which
> > > > means
> > > > the
> > > > ndctl changes will go into v62.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info. I'll make those changes for next time.
> > >
> > > I think I may need to send a v2 for this. Should we have this fall
> > > back
> > > to
> > > the available_size for the older kernels where the
> > > max_available_extents
> > > attribute is not provided? I actually had that in my repo and used a
> > > slightly older patch here, but I'm not sure if its okay to strongly
> > > couple an ndctl release to a kernel version.
> >
> > I was thinking that too. Typically we don't guarantee ndctl to work
> > with
> > old kernels, but this does seem like a bit of an invasive change.
> >
> > Dan, thoughts?
>
> It should fall back if the attribute is not available. Our *tests*
> aren't guaranteed to pass on older kernels, but ndctl proper should
> try it's best to accommodate old kernels.
Ah yes makes sense.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-26 15:37 [PATCH 0/2] Namespace creation fixups Keith Busch
2018-06-26 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] libnvdimm: Use largest contiguous area for namespace size Keith Busch
2018-07-05 17:57 ` Dan Williams
2018-07-05 17:58 ` Keith Busch
2018-06-26 15:37 ` [PATCH] ndctl: Use max_available_extent for creating namespaces Keith Busch
2018-06-26 16:19 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-06-26 16:29 ` Keith Busch
2018-06-26 16:27 ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-06-26 16:32 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-26 16:34 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2018-06-26 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm: Export max available extent Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530030875.27147.24.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).