nvdimm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
	"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
	Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:49:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E3B94DED8F@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730195548.580717146@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>

Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>;
> Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> following warnings:
> 
> ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> 	Type=0x0A
> 
> On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> 
> Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> 
>  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> 
> -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> 
>  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> 
> 
> --

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-01 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180730195545.795802877@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
2018-07-30 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings Mike Travis
2018-08-01 19:49   ` Moore, Robert [this message]
2018-08-01 20:38     ` Russ Anderson
2018-08-01 21:24       ` Moore, Robert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E3B94DED8F@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=erik.schmauss@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).