From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org>
Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com (mail-oi0-x241.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33AF21B02822
 for <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l82-v6so5048579oih.11
 for <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdKZVUPBk=rg5kfUuFBpuZQEKPuGw31x5O2nMyuULgi0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180910232615.4068.29155.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180910234354.4068.65260.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
 <7b96298e-9590-befd-0670-ed0c9fcf53d5@microsoft.com>
 <CAKgT0UdKZVUPBk=rg5kfUuFBpuZQEKPuGw31x5O2nMyuULgi0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:50:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gEDwp8Xh4_E8RNBC_OqstwhqxkZOpvYjWd_siB4C=BEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: Defer ZONE_DEVICE page initialization to the
 point where we init pgmap
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/linux-nvdimm>,
 <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm>,
 <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org
Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" <linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= <jglisse@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
List-ID: <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:59 AM Pasha Tatashin
> <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
>> Please re-base on linux-next,  memmap_init_zone() has been updated there
>> compared to mainline. You might even find a way to unify some parts of
>> memmap_init_zone and memmap_init_zone_device as memmap_init_zone() is a
>> lot simpler now.
>
> This patch applied to the linux-next tree with only a little bit of
> fuzz. It looks like it is mostly due to some code you had added above
> the function as well. I have updated this patch so that it will apply
> to both linux and linux-next by just moving the new function to
> underneath memmap_init_zone instead of above it.
>
>> I think __init_single_page() should stay local to page_alloc.c to keep
>> the inlining optimization.
>
> I agree. In addition it will make pulling common init together into
> one space easier. I would rather not have us create an opportunity for
> things to further diverge by making it available for anybody to use.

I'll buy the inline argument for keeping the new routine in
page_alloc.c, but I otherwise do not see the divergence danger or
"making __init_single_page() available for anybody" given the the
declaration is limited in scope to a mm/ local header file.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm