On 01-Jul-2021, at 9:58 PM, Ed Tanous <ed@tanous.net> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:10 AM Naveen Moses S <naveenmoses@fb.com> wrote:
Hello All,
I need your suggestion on implementing support for multiple computer systems or hosts under redfish implementation of BMCWEB.
Redfish schema supports multiple computer systems under redfish path "/redfish/v1/Systems/"
Currently in bmcweb redfish core Computer systems path are is configured for as singlehost
The redfish path computer system is given below
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system”
In case of multiple hosts can we use the following format.
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system1”
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system2”
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system3”
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system4”
these paths should be populated based on the number of available hosts/computer systems
Possible options to identify the host count are as given below:
1.pass the OBMC_HOST_INSTANCES as a macro definition to bmcweb
Please don't do this. In general we only use configure options for
things that cannot be dynamically discovered on dbus or via the
mapper, or where different implementations of things exist that meet
the same API (like log service). I don't think multi-host falls into
either of those categories, as it can be seen on dbus.
2.Query dbus objects which has individual instance available for each host using object mapper.
This would far and above be my preference, as it's similar to how the
rest of the bmcweb URIs function.
Is there any other alternate way available for identifying host instances at runtime under bmcweb?
if we use the above format then can we change the computer system for single host
as given below
"/redfish/v1/Systems/system0”
I would much prefer these are just based on the dbus path names
instead of trying to explicitly pick a name. That keeps bmcweb
consistent with other resources, and systems that only implement a
single host can choose to keep the same odata.id (system) if they
want.
Code reference : https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/blob/master/redfish-core/lib/systems.hpp
method : requestRoutesSystemsCollection
Thanks
Looking forward to seeing the patches. Thanks for looking into this.
-Ed