platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@163.com>,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br, Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>
Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2,1/1] Fix WWAN device disabled issue after S3 deep
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:03:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70e53b58-4785-5a3d-9525-a7f9e93cd0d2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811093407.5583-1-slark_xiao@163.com>

Hi,

On 8/11/21 11:34 AM, Slark Xiao wrote:
> When WWAN device wake from S3 deep, under thinkpad platform,
> WWAN would be disabled. This disable status could be checked
>  by command 'nmcli r wwan' or 'rfkill list'.
> Issue analysis as below:
>   When host resume from S3 deep, thinkpad_acpi driver would
> call hotkey_resume() function. Finnaly, it will use
> wan_get_status to check the current status of WWAN device.
> During this resume progress, wan_get_status would always
> return off even WWAN boot up completely.
>   If wan_get_status() return off, rfkill_set_sw_state() would set WWAN's
> status as disabled.
>   This may be a fault of LENOVO BIOS.
>   Workaround is add a WWAN device check before rfkill_set_sw_state().
> If it's a Foxconn WWAN device, then we will ignore to do a status update.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@163.com>

Thank you for debugging this and thank you for the patch.

I'm not in favor of using a pci-device-id list here. Maybe we should
simply just never update the sw-rfkill state after a suspend-resume ?

I mean the sw_state should be unchanged after a suspend/resume.

Only the hw_state on older devices which still have a physical
radio on/off slider on the side might have changed during suspend.

So I think it might be better to just drop the tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate
call all together from the resume path?

Mark do you have any input here?

Regards,

Hans



> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 603156a6e3ed..e3b7bc0e7a33 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,13 @@ struct tpacpi_rfk_ops {
>  
>  static struct tpacpi_rfk *tpacpi_rfkill_switches[TPACPI_RFK_SW_MAX];
>  
> +/*Foxconn SDX55 T77W175 products. All available device ID*/
> +static const struct pci_device_id foxconn_device_ids[] = {
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FOXCONN, 0xE0AB) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FOXCONN, 0xE0AF) },
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FOXCONN, 0xE0B4) },
> +	{}
> +};
>  /* Query FW and update rfkill sw state for a given rfkill switch */
>  static int tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate(const struct tpacpi_rfk *tp_rfk)
>  {
> @@ -1182,8 +1189,13 @@ static void tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate_all(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < TPACPI_RFK_SW_MAX; i++)
> -		tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate(tpacpi_rfkill_switches[i]);
> +	for (i = 0; i < TPACPI_RFK_SW_MAX; i++) {
> +		if (pci_dev_present(foxconn_device_ids) && i == 1)
> +			pr_info("Find Foxconn wwan device, ignore to update rfkill switch status\n");
> +		else
> +			tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate(tpacpi_rfkill_switches[i]);
> +
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-12  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11  9:34 [PATCH] [v2,1/1] Fix WWAN device disabled issue after S3 deep Slark Xiao
2021-08-12  8:03 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-08-12 11:35   ` Slark Xiao
2021-08-12 15:02     ` [External]Re:Re: " Mark Pearson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70e53b58-4785-5a3d-9525-a7f9e93cd0d2@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slark_xiao@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).