qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: david.edmondson@oracle.com, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:25:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <082a32cc-c09e-522d-429d-49a1727c81f5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317180013.235231-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 17.03.21 19:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> 
> Given that the block size is read from the header of the VDI file, a
> wide variety of sizes might be seen. Rather than re-using a block
> sized memory region when writing the VDI header, allocate an
> appropriately sized buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> Message-Id: <20210309144015.557477-3-david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/vdi.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/vdi.c b/block/vdi.c
> index 2a6dc26124..548f8a057b 100644
> --- a/block/vdi.c
> +++ b/block/vdi.c
> @@ -696,18 +696,20 @@ nonallocating_write:
>   
>       if (block) {
>           /* One or more new blocks were allocated. */
> -        VdiHeader *header = (VdiHeader *) block;
> +        VdiHeader *header;
>           uint8_t *base;
>           uint64_t offset;
>           uint32_t n_sectors;
>   
> +        g_free(block);

This logic (checking @block != NULL) was a bit weird before and this 
just seems to accomodate it.  We probably shouldn’t check @block, but 
some boolean, and *block should be freed after the while () loop.

Considering the “if (block)” was there already and it’d be weird to keep 
that check if *block were freed by that point, I suppose this isn’t 
making it worse, though, so:

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

> +        header = g_malloc(sizeof(*header));
> +
>           logout("now writing modified header\n");
>           assert(VDI_IS_ALLOCATED(bmap_first));
>           *header = s->header;
>           vdi_header_to_le(header);
> -        ret = bdrv_pwrite(bs->file, 0, block, sizeof(VdiHeader));
> -        g_free(block);
> -        block = NULL;
> +        ret = bdrv_pwrite(bs->file, 0, header, sizeof(*header));
> +        g_free(header);
>   
>           if (ret < 0) {
>               return ret;
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17 18:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25   ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25   ` Max Reitz [this message]
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] coroutine-lock: reimplement CoRwlock to fix downgrade bug Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 16:15   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:40     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:19   ` David Edmondson
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] test-coroutine: Add rwlock downgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Max Reitz
2021-03-24 16:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17 12:16 [PATCH v4 " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=082a32cc-c09e-522d-429d-49a1727c81f5@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).