qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Checkoway <stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu>
To: "QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"open list:Block layer core" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Checkoway <stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Fix command address comparison
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:26:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426162624.55977-4-stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426162624.55977-1-stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu>

Most AMD commands only examine 11 bits of the address. This masks the
addresses used in the comparison to 11 bits. The exceptions are word or
sector addresses which use offset directly rather than the shifted
offset, boff.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Checkoway <stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c   |  8 +++++++-
 tests/pflash-cfi02-test.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
index 4b7af71806..e4bff0c8f8 100644
--- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
+++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
@@ -296,11 +296,13 @@ static void pflash_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
 
     DPRINTF("%s: offset " TARGET_FMT_plx " %08" PRIx64 " %d\n", __func__,
             offset, value, width);
-    boff = offset & (pfl->sector_len - 1);
+    boff = offset;
     if (pfl->width == 2)
         boff = boff >> 1;
     else if (pfl->width == 4)
         boff = boff >> 2;
+    /* Only the least-significant 11 bits are used in most cases. */
+    boff &= 0x7FF;
     switch (pfl->wcycle) {
     case 0:
         /* Set the device in I/O access mode if required */
@@ -519,6 +521,10 @@ static void pflash_cfi02_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         return;
     }
 
+    /* Only 11 bits are used in the comparison. */
+    pfl->unlock_addr0 &= 0x7FF;
+    pfl->unlock_addr1 &= 0x7FF;
+
     chip_len = pfl->sector_len * pfl->nb_blocs;
 
     memory_region_init_rom_device(&pfl->orig_mem, OBJECT(pfl),
diff --git a/tests/pflash-cfi02-test.c b/tests/pflash-cfi02-test.c
index 40af1bb523..ea5f8b2648 100644
--- a/tests/pflash-cfi02-test.c
+++ b/tests/pflash-cfi02-test.c
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
 
 #define FLASH_WIDTH 2
 #define CFI_ADDR (FLASH_WIDTH * 0x55)
-#define UNLOCK0_ADDR (FLASH_WIDTH * 0x5555)
-#define UNLOCK1_ADDR (FLASH_WIDTH * 0x2AAA)
+#define UNLOCK0_ADDR (FLASH_WIDTH * 0x555)
+#define UNLOCK1_ADDR (FLASH_WIDTH * 0x2AA)
 
 #define CFI_CMD 0x98
 #define UNLOCK0_CMD 0xAA
@@ -190,6 +190,14 @@ static void test_flash(void)
     g_assert_cmpint(flash_read(6), ==, 0xCDEF);
     g_assert_cmpint(flash_read(8), ==, 0xFFFF);
 
+    /* Test ignored high order bits of address. */
+    flash_write(FLASH_WIDTH * 0x5555, UNLOCK0_CMD);
+    flash_write(FLASH_WIDTH * 0x2AAA, UNLOCK1_CMD);
+    flash_write(FLASH_WIDTH * 0x5555, AUTOSELECT_CMD);
+    g_assert_cmpint(flash_read(FLASH_WIDTH * 0x0000), ==, 0x00BF);
+    g_assert_cmpint(flash_read(FLASH_WIDTH * 0x0001), ==, 0x236D);
+    reset();
+
     qtest_quit(global_qtest);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-26 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-26 16:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Implement missing AMD pflash functionality Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Add test for supported commands Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-05-06  3:53   ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Refactor, NFC intended Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-05-06  7:34   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-26 16:26 ` Stephen Checkoway [this message]
2019-04-26 16:26   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Fix command address comparison Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Implement intereleaved flash devices Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-06-22 12:25   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-24 19:05     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-24 19:36       ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-06-25  8:32         ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-25 16:41           ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Implement nonuniform sector sizes Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Fix CFI in autoselect mode Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Fix reset command not ignored during erase Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Implement multi-sector erase Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Implement erase suspend/resume Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Use the chip erase time specified in the CFI table Stephen Checkoway
2019-04-26 16:26   ` Stephen Checkoway
2019-05-05 18:57   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 18:57     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190426162624.55977-4-stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu \
    --to=stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).