From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Sukrit Bhatnagar <skrtbhtngr@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [GSoC] Help needed in implementing live migration
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628093828.GD3316@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzgYoOjCNYvadBT0PPorG0wOX3Ymvd5x_1NzW1SH2te1JfN-Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2057 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:02:33AM +0530, Sukrit Bhatnagar wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 00:11, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Sukrit Bhatnagar (skrtbhtngr@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > I am Sukrit, GSoC participant working on PVRDMA live migration.
> > > We had a short chat about vmxnet3 migration about a week ago
> > > on the IRC channel.
> > >
> > > I am facing an issue while doing migration of the pvrdma device.
> > > While loading the device state, we need to perform a few dma
> > > mappings on the destination. But on the destination, the migration
> > > fails due a BounceBuffer being locked (in_use). This global
> > > BounceBuffer is used in address_space_map/unmap functions
> > > which the rdma_pci_dma_map/unmap calls.
> > > Essentially, we need a way to remap guest physical address on
> > > the destination after migration.
> > >
> > > I had posted an RFC a while ago on the list:
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg04924.html
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg04923.html
> > >
> > > My mentors (Marcel and Yuval) told me to ask you for help
> > > regarding this. It would be really great if you can guide me in
> > > finding a workaround for this.
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'll have a look; I need to get some other things finished first.
>
> Adding cc: qemu-devel, sorry for the private email.
I haven't looked deeply but it's surprising that you're hitting
BounceBuffer. My understanding is that's an old mechanism for
supporting exotic things like DMAing to/from device MMIO registers.
Modern machines and guest software usually don't do this. I wonder why
you're hitting this case.
If you look at the BounceBuffer code there's an API to register a
callback (cpu_register_map_client()). That's how the case of multiple
BounceBuffers is supposed to be handled.
Can you double-check your code and figure out how it got here? I don't
think it should be taking this path.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAMzgYoMG1ic-5yiS2ehnDLna+UKgCtMBcSVNmKQx1oxRZqT=yQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20190624184133.GW2726@work-vm>
2019-06-26 23:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [GSoC] Help needed in implementing live migration Sukrit Bhatnagar
2019-06-28 9:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-06-28 11:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190628093828.GD3316@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=skrtbhtngr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).