qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"open list:Network Block Dev..." <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Andrey Shinkevich" <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/1] nbd: Initialize reply on failure
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:21:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719202119.24792-2-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190719202119.24792-1-eblake@redhat.com>

We've had two separate reports of different callers running into use
of uninitialized data if s->quit is set (one detected by gcc -O3,
another by valgrind), due to checking 'nbd_reply_is_simple(reply) ||
s->quit' in the wrong order. Rather than chasing down which callers
need to pre-initialize reply, and whether there are any other
uninitialized uses, it's easier to guarantee that reply will always be
set by nbd_co_receive_one_chunk() even on failure.

The uninitialized use happens to be harmless (the only time the
variable is uninitialized is if s->quit is set, so the conditional
results in the same action regardless of what was read from reply),
and was introduced in commit 65e01d47.

In fixing the problem, it can also be seen that all (one) callers pass
in a non-NULL reply, so there is a dead conditional to also be cleaned
up.

Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190719172001.19770-1-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 block/nbd.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
index 81edabbf35ed..57c1a205811a 100644
--- a/block/nbd.c
+++ b/block/nbd.c
@@ -640,12 +640,11 @@ static coroutine_fn int nbd_co_receive_one_chunk(
                                           request_ret, qiov, payload, errp);

     if (ret < 0) {
+        memset(reply, 0, sizeof(*reply));
         s->quit = true;
     } else {
         /* For assert at loop start in nbd_connection_entry */
-        if (reply) {
-            *reply = s->reply;
-        }
+        *reply = s->reply;
         s->reply.handle = 0;
     }

-- 
2.20.1



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19 20:21 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/1] NBD patches for -rc2 Eric Blake
2019-07-19 20:21 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2019-07-22 12:20 ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190719202119.24792-2-eblake@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).