From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] refine memory_device_get_free_addr
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:05:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014150547.GR4084@habkost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191012090209.GA6047@richard>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not
> >> >necessary to iterate the whole list.
> >> >
> >> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it
> >> >
> >> >v2:
> >> > * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David
> >> > * add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as before
> >> > this change
> >> >
> >> >Wei Yang (2):
> >> > memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check
> >> > memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range
> >> >
> >> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++-
> >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Would someone take this patch set?
> >
> >yes looks good to me too.
> >Eduardo?
> >
>
> Hmm... I don't see this any where. May I ask the status?
Sorry, I hadn't seen Michael's message. Queued on machine-next.
Thanks!
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 0:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] refine memory_device_get_free_addr Wei Yang
2019-07-30 0:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check Wei Yang
2019-08-08 1:42 ` Zeng, Star
2019-08-08 2:13 ` Wei Yang
2019-08-08 2:30 ` Zeng, Star
2019-08-08 2:38 ` Wei Yang
2019-08-08 7:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 2:38 ` Wei Yang
2019-08-19 5:32 ` Zeng, Star
2019-08-19 6:36 ` Wei Yang
2019-07-30 0:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range Wei Yang
2019-07-30 7:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-30 9:30 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-13 23:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] refine memory_device_get_free_addr Wei Yang
2019-09-14 19:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-12 9:02 ` Wei Yang
2019-10-14 15:05 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2019-10-14 22:00 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014150547.GR4084@habkost.net \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).