From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
oleksandr@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] stubs: add stubs for io_uring interface
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:16:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203111600.GA167235@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111111347.GC7297@linux.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:13:47PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 25.10.2019 um 18:04 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > From: Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>
> This commit message needs to answer at least where these stubs are
> actually used. Aren't all callers protected with #ifdef
> CONFIG_LINUX_IO_URING? (And if they aren't, why is abort() okay?)
Okay, I'll clarify in the commit description.
I didn't find a program that actually requires these stubs today, but in
theory they are required when:
1. A program links against util-obj-y but not block-obj-y (e.g.
vhost-user-gpu)
AND
2. It uses util/async.o, which depends on luring_*() APIs
You can test this by adding a call to qemu_bh_new() into
vhost-user-gpu's main.c:
ld: libqemuutil.a(async.o): in function `aio_ctx_finalize':
qemu/util/async.c:281: undefined reference to `luring_detach_aio_context'
ld: /home/stefanha/qemu/util/async.c:282: undefined reference to `luring_cleanup'
ld: libqemuutil.a(async.o): in function `aio_setup_linux_io_uring':
qemu/util/async.c:358: undefined reference to `luring_init'
ld: /home/stefanha/qemu/util/async.c:363: undefined reference to `luring_attach_aio_context'
The program may have no intention of using io_uring, just the QEMU main
loop and BH, so there is an argument for avoiding linking block-obj-y*.
That's the purpose of the stubs and why abort() is okay.
* It's possible to argue against this and personally I'm not that
convinced by stubs for this scenario. But io_uring.o should be
consistent with how things work today with linux-aio.o. If you feel
strongly against having stubs then the linux-aio.o stubs should also be
removed (see commit c2b38b277a788).
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 16:04 [PATCH v2 00/15] io_uring: add Linux io_uring AIO engine Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] configure: permit use of io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] qapi/block-core: add option for io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 19:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] block/block: add BDRV flag " Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-11 10:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-11-11 16:25 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-13 11:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] block/io_uring: implements interfaces " Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] stubs: add stubs for io_uring interface Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-11 11:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-11-13 11:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-12-03 11:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-12-03 14:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-12-03 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] util/async: add aio interfaces for io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] blockdev: adds bdrv_parse_aio to use io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] block/file-posix.c: extend " Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] block: add trace events for io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] block/io_uring: adds userspace completion polling Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] qemu-io: adds option to use aio engine Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] qemu-img: adds option to use aio engine for benchmarking Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] qemu-nbd: adds option for aio engines Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] tests/qemu-iotests: enable testing with aio options Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-25 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] tests/qemu-iotests: use AIOMODE with various tests Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-04 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] io_uring: add Linux io_uring AIO engine Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-13 11:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191203111600.GA167235@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mehta.aaru20@gmail.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).