qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"Aaron Lindsay" <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/21] target/arm: Stop assuming DBGDIDR always exists
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:51:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214175116.9164-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214175116.9164-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>

The AArch32 DBGDIDR defines properties like the number of
breakpoints, watchpoints and context-matching comparators.  On an
AArch64 CPU, the register may not even exist if AArch32 is not
supported at EL1.

Currently we hard-code use of DBGDIDR to identify the number of
breakpoints etc; this works for all our TCG CPUs, but will break if
we ever add an AArch64-only CPU.  We also have an assert() that the
AArch32 and AArch64 registers match, which currently works only by
luck for KVM because we don't populate either of these ID registers
from the KVM vCPU and so they are both zero.

Clean this up so we have functions for finding the number
of breakpoints, watchpoints and context comparators which look
in the appropriate ID register.

This allows us to drop the "check that AArch64 and AArch32 agree
on the number of breakpoints etc" asserts:
 * we no longer look at the AArch32 versions unless that's the
   right place to be looking
 * it's valid to have a CPU (eg AArch64-only) where they don't match
 * we shouldn't have been asserting the validity of ID registers
   in a codepath used with KVM anyway

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/cpu.h          |  7 +++++++
 target/arm/internals.h    | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/arm/debug_helper.c |  6 +++---
 target/arm/helper.c       | 21 +++++---------------
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 98240224c0c..0f21b6ed803 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1840,6 +1840,13 @@ FIELD(ID_DFR0, MPROFDBG, 20, 4)
 FIELD(ID_DFR0, PERFMON, 24, 4)
 FIELD(ID_DFR0, TRACEFILT, 28, 4)
 
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, SE_IMP, 12, 1)
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, NSUHD_IMP, 14, 1)
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, VERSION, 16, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, CTX_CMPS, 20, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, BRPS, 24, 4)
+FIELD(DBGDIDR, WRPS, 28, 4)
+
 FIELD(MVFR0, SIMDREG, 0, 4)
 FIELD(MVFR0, FPSP, 4, 4)
 FIELD(MVFR0, FPDP, 8, 4)
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 052449b4826..39239186def 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -931,6 +931,48 @@ static inline uint32_t arm_debug_exception_fsr(CPUARMState *env)
     }
 }
 
+/**
+ * arm_num_brps: Return number of implemented breakpoints.
+ * Note that the ID register BRPS field is "number of bps - 1",
+ * and we return the actual number of breakpoints.
+ */
+static inline int arm_num_brps(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+        return FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, BRPS) + 1;
+    } else {
+        return FIELD_EX32(cpu->dbgdidr, DBGDIDR, BRPS) + 1;
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * arm_num_wrps: Return number of implemented watchpoints.
+ * Note that the ID register WRPS field is "number of wps - 1",
+ * and we return the actual number of watchpoints.
+ */
+static inline int arm_num_wrps(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+        return FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, WRPS) + 1;
+    } else {
+        return FIELD_EX32(cpu->dbgdidr, DBGDIDR, WRPS) + 1;
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * arm_num_ctx_cmps: Return number of implemented context comparators.
+ * Note that the ID register CTX_CMPS field is "number of cmps - 1",
+ * and we return the actual number of comparators.
+ */
+static inline int arm_num_ctx_cmps(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+        return FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, CTX_CMPS) + 1;
+    } else {
+        return FIELD_EX32(cpu->dbgdidr, DBGDIDR, CTX_CMPS) + 1;
+    }
+}
+
 /* Note make_memop_idx reserves 4 bits for mmu_idx, and MO_BSWAP is bit 3.
  * Thus a TCGMemOpIdx, without any MO_ALIGN bits, fits in 8 bits.
  */
diff --git a/target/arm/debug_helper.c b/target/arm/debug_helper.c
index 2e3e90c6a57..2ff72d47d19 100644
--- a/target/arm/debug_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/debug_helper.c
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ static bool linked_bp_matches(ARMCPU *cpu, int lbn)
 {
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
     uint64_t bcr = env->cp15.dbgbcr[lbn];
-    int brps = extract32(cpu->dbgdidr, 24, 4);
-    int ctx_cmps = extract32(cpu->dbgdidr, 20, 4);
+    int brps = arm_num_brps(cpu);
+    int ctx_cmps = arm_num_ctx_cmps(cpu);
     int bt;
     uint32_t contextidr;
     uint64_t hcr_el2;
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static bool linked_bp_matches(ARMCPU *cpu, int lbn)
      * case DBGWCR<n>_EL1.LBN must indicate that breakpoint).
      * We choose the former.
      */
-    if (lbn > brps || lbn < (brps - ctx_cmps)) {
+    if (lbn >= brps || lbn < (brps - ctx_cmps)) {
         return false;
     }
 
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 11b87723e47..8415cc6b154 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6256,23 +6256,12 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
     };
 
     /* Note that all these register fields hold "number of Xs minus 1". */
-    brps = extract32(cpu->dbgdidr, 24, 4);
-    wrps = extract32(cpu->dbgdidr, 28, 4);
-    ctx_cmps = extract32(cpu->dbgdidr, 20, 4);
+    brps = arm_num_brps(cpu);
+    wrps = arm_num_wrps(cpu);
+    ctx_cmps = arm_num_ctx_cmps(cpu);
 
     assert(ctx_cmps <= brps);
 
-    /* The DBGDIDR and ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 define various properties
-     * of the debug registers such as number of breakpoints;
-     * check that if they both exist then they agree.
-     */
-    if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
-        assert(FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, BRPS) == brps);
-        assert(FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, WRPS) == wrps);
-        assert(FIELD_EX64(cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, CTX_CMPS)
-               == ctx_cmps);
-    }
-
     define_one_arm_cp_reg(cpu, &dbgdidr);
     define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, debug_cp_reginfo);
 
@@ -6280,7 +6269,7 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, debug_lpae_cp_reginfo);
     }
 
-    for (i = 0; i < brps + 1; i++) {
+    for (i = 0; i < brps; i++) {
         ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
             { .name = "DBGBVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
               .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 4,
@@ -6299,7 +6288,7 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, dbgregs);
     }
 
-    for (i = 0; i < wrps + 1; i++) {
+    for (i = 0; i < wrps; i++) {
         ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
             { .name = "DBGWVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
               .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 6,
-- 
2.20.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14 17:50 [PATCH v2 00/21] arm: ARMv8.1- and v8.4-PMU, ID reg cleanup, [H]ACTLR2 Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] target/arm: Add _aa32_ to isar_feature functions testing 32-bit ID registers Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] target/arm: Check aa32_pan in take_aarch32_exception(), not aa64_pan Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:10   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] target/arm: Add isar_feature_any_fp16 and document naming/usage conventions Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] target/arm: Define and use any_predinv isar_feature test Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] target/arm: Factor out PMU register definitions Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] target/arm: Add and use FIELD definitions for ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] target/arm: Use FIELD macros for clearing ID_DFR0 PERFMON field Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] target/arm: Define an aa32_pmu_8_1 isar feature test function Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] target/arm: Add _aa64_ and _any_ versions of pmu_8_1 isar checks Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2020-02-14 20:15   ` [PATCH v2 10/21] target/arm: Stop assuming DBGDIDR always exists Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] target/arm: Move DBGDIDR into ARMISARegisters Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:16   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] target/arm: Read debug-related ID registers from KVM Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:27   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.1-PMU extension Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.4-PMU extension Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] target/arm: Provide ARMv8.4-PMU in '-cpu max' Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] target/arm: Correct definition of PMCRDP Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] target/arm: Correct handling of PMCR_EL0.LC bit Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] target/arm: Test correct register in aa32_pan and aa32_ats1e1 checks Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:30   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] target/arm: Use isar_feature function for testing AA32HPD feature Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:32   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] target/arm: Use FIELD_EX32 for testing 32-bit fields Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:32   ` Richard Henderson
2020-02-14 17:51 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] target/arm: Correctly implement ACTLR2, HACTLR2 Peter Maydell
2020-02-14 20:42   ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200214175116.9164-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=aaron@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).