From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 8/9] KVM: Add dirty-ring-size property
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:03:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326160326.GF422390@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326134144.GC2713@work-vm>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:41:44PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (peterx@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 08:00:31PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > @@ -2077,6 +2079,33 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
> > > > s->memory_listener.listener.coalesced_io_add = kvm_coalesce_mmio_region;
> > > > s->memory_listener.listener.coalesced_io_del = kvm_uncoalesce_mmio_region;
> > > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Enable KVM dirty ring if supported, otherwise fall back to
> > > > + * dirty logging mode
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (s->kvm_dirty_ring_size > 0) {
> > > > + /* Read the max supported pages */
> > > > + ret = kvm_vm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING);
> > > > + if (ret > 0) {
> > > > + if (s->kvm_dirty_ring_size > ret) {
> > > > + error_report("KVM dirty ring size %d too big (maximum is %d). "
> > > > + "Please use a smaller value.",
> > > > + s->kvm_dirty_ring_size, ret);
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING, 0,
> > > > + s->kvm_dirty_ring_size);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + error_report("Enabling of KVM dirty ring failed: %d", ret);
> > > > + goto err;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + s->kvm_dirty_gfn_count =
> > > > + s->kvm_dirty_ring_size / sizeof(struct kvm_dirty_gfn);
> > >
> > > What happens if I was to pass dirty-ring-size=1 ?
> > > Then the count would be 0 and things would get upset somewhere?
> > > Do you need to check for a minimum postive value?
> >
> > The above kvm_vm_enable_cap() should fail directly and QEMU will stop.
> > Yes we should check it, but kernel will do that in all cases, so I
> > just didn't do that explicitly again in the userspace.
>
> We probably should have that check since you can give them a more
> obvious error message.
Yes we can. Or I can enhance the error message when we failed with
kvm_vm_enable_cap() so the user will get the important hints. I think
maybe that's more important than the explicit check itself.
>
> > I was planning this to be an advanced feature so the user of this
> > parameter should know the rules to pass values in.
>
> Advanced users just make advanced mistakes :-)
>
> I did wonder if perhaps this option should be a count of entries rather
> than a byte size.
Sometimes it's easier to know "how many bytes we used", while instead
sometimes we want to know "how many dirty addresses we can track".
But sure I can switch, considering the users might be more interested
in the latter. :)
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 14:17 [PATCH RFC 0/9] KVM: Dirty ring support (QEMU part) Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] KVM: Fixup kvm_log_clear_one_slot() ioctl return check Peter Xu
2020-03-25 16:34 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 17:43 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] linux-headers: Update Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] memory: Introduce log_sync_global() to memory listener Peter Xu
2020-03-25 16:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 17:02 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] KVM: Create the KVMSlot dirty bitmap on flag changes Peter Xu
2020-03-25 17:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] KVM: Provide helper to get kvm dirty log Peter Xu
2020-03-25 17:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 18:15 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] KVM: Provide helper to sync dirty bitmap from slot to ramblock Peter Xu
2020-03-25 18:47 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] KVM: Cache kvm slot dirty bitmap size Peter Xu
2020-03-25 18:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] KVM: Add dirty-ring-size property Peter Xu
2020-03-25 20:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-26 13:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-26 16:03 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-03-25 20:14 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 20:48 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:17 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] KVM: Dirty ring support Peter Xu
2020-03-25 20:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-25 21:32 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-26 14:14 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-26 16:10 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-05 14:51 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] KVM: Dirty ring support (QEMU part) no-reply
2020-03-03 17:32 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326160326.GF422390@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).